Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 221 - 240 of 15,259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Kellie N. Lego
 Question #1 – Premium Processing Can Premium Processing be used to speed out the processing of an H-1B extension? [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Kellie N. Lego
Question #1 – Naturalization Will I be asked all 100 civics questions during the naturalization interview? [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:11 am
February 23, 2012): Notwithstanding the Government's evidence that the house at 1986 Benthill Drive was used for some drug activity, the evidence does not establish that the house was used primarily for drug operations. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 11:07 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Recycling Services, 2015 ONSC 96, at para. 23. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 4:28 am
Illinois does not have an elaborate regulatory structure for its probationers, unlike in Griffin and Samson, so the "special needs" exception does not come into play. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 4:15 am by IPWatchdog
The case was set to be argued on Monday, March 23, but was postponed due to the coronavirus pandemic. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Don Chen
The Security Council voted 13-1 in favor of the resolution, with the United Kingdom abstaining. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
As DABUS was not a person, it could not have done that ([23]) and thus Dr Thaler failed to establish the right to be granted the patent. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 5:00 am by Kellie N. Lego
Question #1 – What are my rights when stopped by Authorities as a foreign national in the US? [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 5:00 am by Kellie N. Lego
Question #1 – What are my rights when stopped by Authorities as a foreign national in the US? [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:44 am
Does the first sentence of Article 23(1) of Council Regulation 207/2009 on the Community trade mark preclude a licensee who is not entered in the Register of Community trade marks from invoking claims for infringement of a Community trade mark? [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by PaulKostro
. __ (2012), A-48-10, 067006, January 23, 2012: Absent a valid excuse, a person who does not comply with a subpoena to testify may be held in contempt. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:37 am by Derek A. Colvin
The FTC Issued a new rule banning most non competes On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission issued the final version of its new rule to ban most non competes. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 6:48 am
This decision does not stand for the proposition that mistaken testimony at a warrant hearing cannot later be corrected. [read post]