Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm
Does QOCS protection apply to DAs? [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 5:45 am
(See note 1, infra.) [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 4:42 am
The existence of another, alternative rational conclusion does not warrant annulment of the appointing authority’s conclusion that Peil was guilty of the charges preferred against him, citing Incorporated Vill. of Lake Success v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, 41 AD3d 599.* Text of decision e-mailed to registered readers. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:07 am
The TTAB recently decided the appeals from three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am
What if the return on that technology was $400:$1--for every $1 of government program money spent, the return in cost savings was $400? [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:26 am
The Opinion im Movic seems to continue this tendency: The following considerations were taken into account: (1) what does the nature of interests of the public authority to issue its request to the court need or not need to be (paras. 24 et seq.); (ii) in what way does the authority’s powers of investigation influence the analysis (paras. 48 et seq.), and (iii) whether the authority is granted special powers not available to private persons (here in particular the… [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:09 pm
Justice Donald wrote at paragraph 41:[41] Granting an automatic exemption to recipients of employment or disability insurance suggests a more generous approach than was previously taken. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:39 am
Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(i) is therefore appropriate. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
Originally posted 2017-04-10 11:00:41. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm
The resolution is drawn from a draft model “say on pay” policy crafted by the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance (CCGG), which represents 41 investors managing over $1 trillion in assets. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 1:23 pm
Ruscus, Morgan Lewis; Amber Mackenzie, Senior Technical Reviewer and Acting Branch Chief, Exempt Organizations Branch 1 (EEE), Office of Chief Counsel, IRS; Sarah Daya, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), IRS; Patrick Clinton, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), IRS; Dianna Seaborn, Director of the Office of Financial Assistance, Office of Capital Access, U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 6:23 pm
United States, 290 U.S. 41, 47, 54 S. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:17 am
Texas count actually 305 41 Hospitalized Taylor Farms identified as source in only Iowa and Nebraska illnesses A total of 641 cases of Cyclospora infection have been reported from 24 states and New York City. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:25 am
Even these recently extended exemptions – which simply recognize the reality that California employees and business representatives are not consumers and should not have the same extensive rights to get copies of or delete their data – were subject to a sunset of January 1, 2021, now extended to January 1, 2022. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 3:07 pm
P. 41(c)(1) should not be excluded where defendant was not present when the search of home took place because "there was neither a possibility of bad faith conduct on the part of the police, nor prejudice to the defendant," and "no substantial right of the defendant ha[d] been infringed"; therefore, the search was "reasonable" under the Fourth Amendment); Gamble v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
§4712(a)(1). [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
There are several means by which to establish a parental relationship under the Act: (1) genetic contribution, N.J.S.A. 9:17-41; 4 (2) gestational primacy, i.e., giving birth, N.J.S.A. 9:17-41(a); or (3) adoption, N.J.S.A. 9:17-41(c). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:36 am
’836 patent col. 7 ll. 41–44. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 1:45 am
Issue 1) Did the respondent’s failure promptly to notify the appellant of the revocation of his sponsor’s licence breach the duty of procedural fairness? [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:02 am
KNUT IP Management Ltd, on the other had contended an infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 207/2009. [read post]
