Search for: "Does 1 - 44"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2023, 6:59 am
Then, if you earn $100 and can either pay consumption tax of $40 this year or $44 in a year, deferral does not reduce the tax's present value. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 12:05 am
Here is the key language Pages 42 - 44 of the Court's Order. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:50 pm
Int’l L. & Pol. 1 (2011).] [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Moreover the claim amended by the introduction of the disclaimer does not comply with the requirement of clarity pursuant to A 84. [12] Consequently, the Board is of the opinion that the amendment of claim 1 violates A 123(2). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm
Consider the following advice. 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:00 pm
Call 1-866-348-7394 today for a free and confidential consultation - or visit the firm on the web at www.jhllp.com. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
State, 2003 WY 98, PP5-11, 74 P.3d 1240, 1243-44 (Wyo. 2003). [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 143-44 n.12, 99 S.Ct. 421, 430-31 n.12, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978). [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:48 am
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [1] In tables 7 and 8, “Gov’t below”: (a) includes §5K1.1 Substantial Assistance Departures, §5K3.1 Early Disposition Program Departures and other government-sponsored below-range sentences; (b) does not include Rule 35 reductions for cooperation with the government that take place after sentencing. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 2:39 pm
The ECJ held that Article 15 (1) (c) does not distinguish between contracts concluded at a distance and those concluded on the spot. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 11:22 am
In my view, that does not assist. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 1:23 pm
Mason Dixon had McCain ahead in Florida by 1, 46-45. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:02 pm
The Dutch lower courts seised of the matter took the view that they lacked jurisdiction either under Article 18(1) and Article 20(1) of the Brussels I Regulation, since the domicile of the defendant was outside the Netherlands, or under Article 5(1)(a), to be read in conjunction with Article 5(3). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:34 pm
” Oregon HJR 44 (of 2011), now known as Measure 78, amends three of these references to correct spelling errors and change “department” to read “branch” (Art. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
SECTION 1-201. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:13 pm
The Austrian Supreme Court had referred the following question to the European Court of Justice: “Does the application of Article 15 (1) (c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters presuppose that the contract between the consumer and the undertaking has been concluded at a distance? [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
Alberta (aff’d ABCA; leave to appeal to SCC refused) as justified under s. 1 [56] The objective of the age requirement is similarly clear if one considers that, in the absence of an age requirement, babies meeting the citizenship and residency requirements would be eligible to vote. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
. - As does happen, The Prof can flub. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:01 pm
” Painfully, Article 15 (1) c) does not give any clue what “directing” its activity to the member State of the consumer’s domicile could actually mean. [read post]
