Search for: "Does 1-36" Results 221 - 240 of 5,338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2018, 11:34 am by Derek T. Muller
" It does not give "full weight" in its metrics to jobs that were funded by the law school. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:15 am by Frantzeska Papadopoulou
Orphan medicinal products are excluded from the right to the six-month SPC extension offered in Article 36(1) of the Paediatric Regulation. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:48 am by Giles Peaker
The Court of Appeal lead judgment (on a 2:1 split decision) found as follows. [read post]
15 May 2017, 7:56 am by Derek T. Muller
It does not include clerkships obtained by students after graduation; it only includes clerkships obtained by each year's graduating class.I included some schools that had only one or two year's worth of data, like the separate Penn State schools. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 4:44 am
But Clark Superior Court 1 Judge Vicki Carmichael ruled that use of parks is not a fundamental right.Thee 36-year-old Dowdell had filed a lawsuit seeking to overturn the ordinance. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:56 am
" There's an immediate, warm laugh from the assembly, and the instant he hears it, his face shows gratification:He really does feed off the energy of the crowd. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 5:41 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
On appeal, Sandoz disputes theDistrict Court’s construction, arguing, inter alia, that:(1) the “wherein” clauses “merely state the intended resultsof administering Combigan[®] twice daily,” Appellant’sBr. 36; see id. at 36–49; and (2) the recited results are not“material to patentability,” id. at 50; see id. at 50–62. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:24 am by laurahess
It does not include good faith errors in judgment, among other things. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
Appeals filed under the EB3 preference category (Skilled and Professional workers) are currently being reviewed within 36 months. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:00 am
Appeals filed under the EB3 preference category (Skilled and Professional workers) are currently being reviewed within 36 months. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:00 am by Marcel Pemsel
The Polish court wondered whether Artt. 34, 35 and 36 TFEU would prevent Hewlett Packard from enforcing its trade mark rights given the circumstances of the case. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:10 pm by Dennis Crouch
Iancu (Supreme Court 2021) has little chance of being granted, but it does offer some insight on USPTO procedure. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 2:38 pm by John Stigi
  The United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, holding that (1) plaintiffs’ section 36(b) claim was barred because the SEC had issued an Exemption Notice expressly permitting BTC to charge the 35% lending fee and (2) section 36(a) does not provide a private right of action. [read post]