Search for: "Does 1-53"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2010, 4:42 am
N.J.S.A. 53:2-1 sets forth the powers and jurisdiction of the New Jersey State Police. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
As the claimed plant is defined only by single recombinant DNS sequences it is not a plant variety according to decision G 1/98.Therefore, the subject-matter of the claims does not violate the requirements of A 53(b).To download the whole decision (in German), click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
When police approached the car, they found the 53-year-old suspect in his car and immediately suspected he was under the influence of alcohol. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
Following decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03 [headnote II.1], such disclaimers are allowed even when not disclosed. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 8:35 pm
However, as a Virginia DUI lawyer, I know that the Virginia Code and caselaw allow for a DUI conviction for much less than driving drunk, thus turning logic, language and reasonableness on its head almost as much as 1+1 does not equal three. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:33 pm
Their sentences ranged from 35 to 53 years. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 8:49 am
Technically, Announcement 53 applies to all non-certified cloth face masks exported from China, but it does not apply to medical grade N95 masks. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:24 pm
Compare General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (1) with General Statutes (Rev. to 1987) § 53-21. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm
It relies on the findings of G 1/04 [6.3] and confirms that “whether or not a method is excluded from patentability under A 53(c) cannot depend on the person carrying it out. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:03 am
What does it take to be a venture capital fund manager? [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Ct. at 2252-54, 53 L. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:36 pm
By Paul Cole[1] How does the Supreme Court decision of 13 June 2013 match international opinion on the patentability of biological material? [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 11:01 am
”[8] One of the questions (question 2) referred to the EBA and answered by it in decision G 1/98 read:“Does a claim which relates to plants but wherein specific plant varieties are not individually claimed ipso facto avoid the prohibition on patenting in A 53(b) even though it embraces plant varieties? [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:01 pm
The wording of claim 1 as granted does not explicitly comprise a surgical step. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 7:22 am
Authorities also reported the death of a 53-year-old man in a separate incident. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:10 pm
Women 49 (about 47%); Men 56 (about 53%). [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 10:26 am
Advance Opinion 53 (Nev. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:58 am
State, 726 S.W.2d 53, 56-57 (Tex. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:10 am
Paragraphs 53 and 66. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:23 am
It appears that the Radio Frequency Interference Rules (O.A.C. 3701-53-04(A)(1)) will still apply and that a check of the Intoxilyzer 8000 every seven (7) days will be required. [read post]
