Search for: "Does 1-68" Results 221 - 240 of 2,484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2014, 6:28 am by MBettman
Even if R.C. 5321.04 was not a negligence per se statute, the Tenants argue that Ohio law does not require a landlord to know of the exact defect for liability to attach. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
”   A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:29 am
Step 1: Calculate 30% of the Payor’s Income In this example, the payor’s income is $200,000 per year, the payee’s income is $40,000 per year, and the couple was married for seven years and seven months prior to divorcing. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:38 am by Romano Beitsma
The fact that D1 does not contain any figures does not hinder the skilled person from understanding the described method or from carrying it out.2.4 D1 discloses a method for dispensing pharmaceuticals upon production of a prescription by the purchaser (page 6, lines 6-8) providing a dispensing machine containing a stock of prescribed pharmaceuticals (page 6, lines 19-20) - i.e. restricted goods in the sense of claim 1 - with an audio communication link from the … [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:36 am by Diane Tweedlie
Furthermore, the appellant had, when withdrawing its appeal against the interlocutory decision on 26 April 2017, expressly reconfirmed its request for continuation of the opposition proceedings and clearly stated that the withdrawal does not affect the request for continuation pursuant to Rule 84(1) EPC. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
Does the CDC like tacos more than sandwiches? [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
Thus, the grounds for refusal sub Article 3(1)(b)-(d) do not ensure that a certain sign is generally kept free for use over time.Unlike the absolute grounds for refusal sub Article 3(1)(b)-(d), the absolute ground relating to shapes (Article 3(1)(e) of the Trade Mark Directive) cannot be overcome by acquired distinctiveness [para 79] and, overall, “it overwhelmingly seeks to protect competition” [para 80, referring… [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 4:20 pm
To make matters more complex, sections 155 to 157 of the revised Insurance Act are amending sections 37, 61(2), 68(1), 76(2), 78, 79(1), 80, 81, 92, 104(2), 119(2), 127(1) of the act itself. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  How does the Court parse liability between predecessor and successor attorneys in these mobile days? [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 1:31 am
Hartfourd Courantby Dan HaarJanuary 29, 2009A guy climbs up a ladder to fix his roof, falls off and breaks his leg, then does the same thing again a few years later. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:23 pm by Wystan Ackerman
But I think that is more likely to happen, if it does, in a case where the defendant has not made a Rule 68 offer (as in this case), but rather makes an unrestricted offer of full relief, including the entry of judgment, untethered to Rule 68. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:23 pm by Wystan Ackerman
But I think that is more likely to happen, if it does, in a case where the defendant has not made a Rule 68 offer (as in this case), but rather makes an unrestricted offer of full relief, including the entry of judgment, untethered to Rule 68. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
But residence as worker does not have such a condition, see Art 7(1)(a) 2004 directive. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 1:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
,col. 49, lines 65–68 (emphasis added).1 Claim 33, whichalso contains the transmitting clause [c], states that “thehub transmit[s] a frame containing information to establisha first interval in the communication cycle duringwhich the information establishing the communicationcycle . . . is transmitted. [read post]