Search for: "Does 1-82"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,892
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
This points to the fact that the tenancy does not end until those powers are at an end. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
The Queen, [1980] 1 SCR 821. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
Table 1. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:51 pm
Health Net (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 1189, 1197 [expense of responding to motions or other preliminary pleadings is not type of prejudice that bars later petition to compel arbitration].) [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:00 am
Healthcare Inc. (1999) 82 F.Supp.2d 1089, 1096: " ‘[D]efendant's argument, that the Agreement cannot violate public policy because . . . it is simply a nullity, ignores the realities of the marketplace. . . . [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:35 am
§ 1104(a)(1), although their discussion of the issue in their appellate brief does not cite that provision.It is an interesting question whether the fiduciary duties imposed by § 404(a)(1) include a duty of disclosure. [read post]
The GDPR as a cyber risk management system: the ECJ cautiously tackles data breaches in the NAP case
22 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm
A broad interpretation of the concept of damage is supported by the wording of Art 82(1), which does not distinguish between actual and potential damage, and of recitals 146 and 85, which specifically refers to the loss of control of one’s data (paras 79-82). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:40 am
State, 82 So.3d 1155 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2012). [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 3:59 am
Co. v Rosenberg & Estis, 192 AD2d 451 [1st Dept 1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 654 [1993]). [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:31 am
Eighty-two percent (82%) are White and 15% African-American. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:06 am
Filed: July 12, 2010Opinion by Judge Ronald RubinHeld: 1. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 11:31 pm
Unless overturned by the Ninth Circuit, that holding would doom a similar Section 1 argument here. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
Cosby, 82 AD3d 63. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
Does the Regulation, in particular Articles 3(c), 3(d) and/or 13(1) of the Regulation preclude the proprie [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
The EUIPO examiner refused registration on grounds that the sign applied for would be contrary to ‘accepted principles of morality’ under Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR.The wording of this absolute ground, which cannot be overcome by, e.g., inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the sign at hand, states that:1. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:31 pm
Total Lines 1 thru 4 $_______________6. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:31 pm
Total Lines 1 thru 4 $_______________6. [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:21 pm
The next disputed term is “equivalent” in claims 75 and 82. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 9:14 pm
Here are a few tentative thoughts. 1. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:00 am
There, the CJEU held that – while the mere provision of physical facilities does not as such amount to communication to the public in accordance with recital 27 – the installation of such facilities and the distribution of a signal by means of television sets by a hotel to customers staying in its rooms, whatever technique is used to transmit the signal, does constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC.Since… [read post]
