Search for: "English et al v. The United States et al"
Results 221 - 240
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG) Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46) Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
Cassim (managing editor) ; Maleka Femida Cassim … [et al.] [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
” The piece emphasises the need for an Anonymisation Unit and training. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:26 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm
” Extradition to the US – the Abu Hamza judgment As set out in a post by Isabel McArdle, further to a decision by the Strasbourg Court (which is not final yet – Hamza et al have 3 months in which to seek an appeal in the Court’s Grand Chamber), Abu Hamza and Babar Ahmad may now be extradited to the US. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:01 pm
ET, Robert Ambrogi will be hosting a panel on Online Dispute Resolution for the Massachusetts Bar Association. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
(Class 46) United States US General Can the ITC keep pace? [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:37 pm
WO 01/08661 to Maloney ("Maloney"), both alone and in combination with United States Patent No. 5,047,248 to Calanchi et al. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
NPR, Al Jazeera and CNN cover the claim. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:12 am
United States opinion last Thursday: On May 16, 2003, Solorzano Arroyo went into labor. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am
Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991) but advised the United States that its grant of authority for that one deposition should not be regarded as precedent and there has been no subsequent record of China permitting a deposition. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
A copy of the Statement of Claim in Yaiguaje et al. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
I also want to wish you, and all thefriends of the people ofthe United States of America, a happy Fourth of July. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Sixth Circuit Holds Disabled Retirees Lack Standing to Bring Claims Under Disabilities ActLeroy McKnight, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Rheingold et al proudly write, "Not only did the court deny all pending motions, he denied all future ones! [read post]
