Search for: "GREEN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 221 - 240
of 309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
Green, D. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm
Greene’s Energy, the Supreme Court decided many consequential issues in this area over the past five terms, with at least 22 decisions. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
As the Supreme Court recently recognized in Arizona v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 7:44 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the court of appeals in which more Supreme Court justices got their start than any other. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, involving the constitutionality of inter partes review. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
In an earlier decision, District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Research & resources The Law, Terrorism and the Right to Know project at University of Reading has set up a page tracking developments and commentary around the government’s Justice and Security Green Paper, which proposes legislation that will change how evidence is managed in civil proceedings and inquests, prompting concerns about secret legal hearings. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:02 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am
That was before the Supreme Court recognized that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to gun ownership in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:40 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and then for Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
White v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:45 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
HILL, Jr., Appellee and Cross-Appellant.No. 05-13-01634-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.Opinion Filed January 26, 2016.773*773 On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
Immigration The second leading and as yet undecided case before the Supreme Court is the Arizona “show me your papers” law which requires the police, upon any otherwise permissible detaining of a person (including for example running a red light), if that officer also has a “reasonable suspicion to believe” that a person is in the country illegally, to ask the detainee to prove his legality (green card or some such). [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia thus fell for the rhetorical gambit in accepting the strawman that scientific certainty is 95%, whereas civil and administrative law certainty is a smidgeon above 50%. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
(Jamal Greene, Nathaniel Persily & Stephen Ansolabehere, “Profiling Originalism,” 111 COLUMBIA L. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Green, D. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:16 am
District Court for the District of Columbia concluded that the measure was “arbitrary and capricious” and had been implemented in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 10:59 am
In October of 2016, AARP filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging the regulations. [read post]
