Search for: "In Re: Designating Order v."
Results 221 - 240
of 5,409
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 4:22 pm
In CG v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 7:34 am
ReBath-v-OReilley-VerifiedComplaint [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
Such orders are extremely rare in libel cases – although the parties in W v JH ([2008] EWHC 399 (QB)) were anonymised, there does not appear to have been a formal order (see HMRC v Bannerjee [2009] 3 All ER 930 [16]) In general, a libel claim is intended to vindicate the rights of the claimant and anonymity would be counter productive. [read post]
25 May 2020, 7:37 am
” Terminiello v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
These flagpoles matched the description but were made to a different design and were broadly the same quality. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 6:07 pm
Rocky Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:01 am
v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, 2010 WL 2802352 (5th Cir. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm
G Adventures If You’re Going To Incorporate Online T&Cs Into a Printed Contract, Do It Right–Holdbrook v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 12:37 pm
Of course, functionality is only one hurdle that product configuration or other trade dress must clear in order to reach the registrability finish line. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:17 pm
Boyce Iron Works, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
OPINION AND ORDER SARGUS, J. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
SeeBouchard v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Circuit in In re Navy Chaplaincy, which invites the Supreme Court’s review. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm
This category seeks to address the facts at issue in Kerry v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
As the CJEU’s case law proves, such requirement applies to any kind of trade mark which is indistinguishable from the appearance of the products, be it a three-dimensional trade mark [Procter & Gamble v OHIM, Joined Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P; Mag Instrument v OHIM, Case C-136/02 P and Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, Case C-173/04 P), a figurative trade mark consisting of a two-dimensional… [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 4:13 am
We’re also seeing more and more “take down” orders in criminal cases. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
The EU Commission’s rejection of the Hairdressers’ Agreement as well as the decision in European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Willem Goudriaan v European Commission, Case T–310/18, 24 October 2019 come to mind. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:21 am
” TrafFix Devices Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:20 am
K-TEC v. [read post]
