Search for: "In Re Marriage of Case"
Results 221 - 240
of 6,432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2013, 12:05 pm
And when same-sex marriage was legalized, Vermont did not automatically convert old civil unions to marriages; you had to specifically re-apply. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
By contrast, the Court of Appeal's general view about what we base support on ("available cash") suggests that trial courts might not find the purchase of a capital asset to be "special" in a given case, in which case we're back to the original problem of distorted support payments -- worse, even, since we've now spent transaction costs on litigating whether something's "special" or not.So it seems to me that the… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:06 pm
Why not take those cases? [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Just because you're filing for your naturalization after having your green card for 5 years does not mean USCIS will not look at your marriage. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:58 pm
Well, now, that's unusual.You're used to seeing child molestation cases in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:49 am
In a recent case, In re Marriage of Davenport, 2011 Cal.App. [...] [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:12 pm
The New Hampshire Supreme Court released an opinion on June 3, In Re Estate of David J. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 11:59 am
But I was struck by the facts of the case. [read post]
9 May 2008, 1:06 pm
That's what we're trying to stress. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 2:28 pm
Supreme Court decided the Obergefell case creating marriage equality throughout the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:45 am
Supreme Court to take up the issue even though it declined to take a same-sex marriage case before beginning its current term on October 6. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm
You're not going to win that one. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:25 am
In this case, the contracting parties are free to marry provided the natural obligations of a previous union are discharged.Well that certainly clears it up. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:48 pm
Stop what you're doing. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:34 am
Continue reading → The post Can My DVPO Be Re-Argued in Child Custody Court? [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 5:25 pm
This is because they’re not married. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
Like Judge Walker, the California Supreme Court in In re Marriage Cases (2008) found that same-sex civil marriage “will not impinge upon the religious freedom of” anyone, for two reasons: “no religion will be required to change its religious policies or practices with regard to same-sex couples, and no religious officiant will be required to solemnize a marriage in contravention of his or her religious beliefs. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:58 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Illinois Supreme Court posted notice that it expects to issue opinions in three cases on Thursday morning at 10:00 a.m., including one civil case, In re Marriage of Earlywine. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 11:43 am
A taste:"The marriage of Mark and Kierstin was dissolved in 2002, but they have remained engaged in litigation regarding child custody and support, which has expanded to involve Cindy, who is Mark‟s current wife. . . . [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:26 am
Who is visiting where on Thanksgiving and does that mean that they’re spending Christmas with the other side? [read post]
