Search for: "J. A. Nicklin"
Results 221 - 240
of 321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am
On 17 April 2019 Nicklin J will hand down judgment in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg (heard 27-28 and 30 November 2018) Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp and Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
On the same day Steyn J heard an application in the case of Ince Group v Persons Unknown On 27 April 2022 Nicklin J heard a mode of trial application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
On 20 October 2022 there was an application in the case of QRT v JBE to commit a defendant for contempt of court for breaching an interim non-disclosure order before Nicklin J, The application was dismissed in that no reporting restriction order had, in fact, been made and in any event the application had failed to comply with CPR 81.4(2)(h) in that it did not include a summary of the facts alleged to constitute the contempt. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Canada In the case of Huff v Zuk, 2019 ABQB 691 K D Nixon J awarded the plaintiff defamation damages of $50,000 in action between two dentists. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
On the same day Elisabeth Laing J heard a preliminary issue trial in the case of Warnes v Forge. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm
The ‘unipolar’ model The other model of tort and harm, which clearly underpins Mann J. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
There was further hearing on 1 February 2019 before Warby J at which the Daily Telegraph complained that Arcadia was continuing to threaten those who had signed NDAs with legal action. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
The approach to determining meaning, was expanded by Nicklin J in Koutsogiannis v Random House Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 48 (QB); [2020] 4 W.L.R. 25 at [12], later endorsed by the Court of Appeal in Millett v Corbyn [2021] EWCA Civ 567; [2021] E.M.L.R. 19 at [8]. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 4:37 pm
The headline-grabbing point was that Warby J considered that the relevant authorities meant that “nothing short of a conscious or negligent abuse of media freedom” would justify a finding of harassment in a case where harassment by publication constitutes the course of conduct complained of. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
On the same day Nicklin J handed down judgment in the harassment case of Khan (formerly JMO) v Khan (formerly KTA) [2018] EWHC 241 (QB)). [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
Nicklin J held that tweets by actor Laurence Fox were defamatory allegations of fact. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm
Saini J held that this made a defamatory allegation of fact. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
Nicklin J stated that “(i) The statement must be recognisable as comment, as distinct from an imputation of fact. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
Nicklin J refused to accept certain undertakings offered by the defendant in a harassment case but gave the claimant permission to appeal. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
Fancourt J said that granting the application would be costly and lead to “unsatisfactory” delays. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
The defendant appealed to the High court and Kerr J allowed the appeal on the basis that the claim was an abuse of process as it constituted an attempt to re-litigate issues previously determined and undermine the claimant’s criminal convictions. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
Last Week in the Courts On Monday 13 May 2024 there was an application for permission to appeal in the case of Saddler v Chiltern Support and Housing Ltd KA-2023-000055, before Linden J. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 4:02 pm
By consent on 17 September 2020, Nicklin J ordered that the natural and ordinary meaning of the words complained of should be determined as a preliminary issue. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
On 17 November 2017 Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Alsaifi v Trinity Mirror plc [2017] EWHC 2873. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
On 16 February 2023 there was a statement in open court in the case of Paul and Clare Wylie v Channel 5 Broadcasting Limited before Chamberlain J. [read post]
