Search for: "James C. Day" Results 221 - 240 of 2,178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2009, 6:24 am
The only good thing appeared to be when the classless LeBron James and teammates mugged for the cameras and boogied together during a late time out. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 12:31 am by Michael Geist
I attended yesterday's C-32 media lockup on behalf of the Toronto Star, who asked for a quick analysis piece of the bill. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Kevin Hickey, Consent, Refusal, and Fair Use Consent is irrelevant in black letter law, but consent and disapproval are not binary. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:11 pm by Tom Fisher
At the June 15, 2010 hearing, the ITC received testimony from the following witnesses: Professor Lee Branstetter of Carnegie Mellon University; Professor C. [read post]
8 Jun 2005, 2:06 pm
(C'mon, Liam has a point. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:11 pm by Ben Vernia
., the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed Eastern District of Virginia Judge James C. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:57 pm by Frank Pasquale
’ On this particular day . . . one unfortunate Aiden M. was lowered from ‘overcoming the loss of loved one’ to ‘letting personal life interfere with job. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am by Michael C. Dorf
Rosenstein produced his memo the same day that Trump fired Comey, without waiting for the result of an Inspector General investigation of Comey’s handling of the Clinton case. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 7:33 am by Kelly Buchanan
IV, c.96) “for the better administration of justice in New South Wales and Van Diemen’s Land, and for the effectual government thereof; …”  This legislation, commonly called the New South Wales Act 1823, authorized the establishment of a legislative council in New South Wales and of Supreme Courts in both New South Wales and Van Diemen’s Land. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:28 am
  The state criminal rules are modeled after the Federal ones, and the only appreciable difference in Rule 29(C) between the two is that the Federal rule requires the motion to be made seven days, instead of fourteen, after the verdict. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:55 pm by Michael Geist
Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore was quick to criticize opposition concerns, but garnering the requisite votes to pass the legislation will require compromise. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:44 pm
Rule 1.5(c) requires that, if the attorney is terminated or if the client makes the request, and the contingency has not yet arisen, the lawyer must provide a written itemization of services and expenses within 20 days, unless there will be no claim if terminated. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[c]ases challenging the timing, methods, funding and providers of abortion are headed inexorably toward the high court at a time when Chief Justice John Roberts and his colleagues are seeking a lower profile. [read post]