Search for: "Kaplan, Inc."
Results 221 - 240
of 543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2016, 3:37 am
Kaplan Books, Inc. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:51 am
Member Kaplan’s Dissent Board Member Marvin Kaplan disagreed with the Board’s application of Darlington, and dissented, stating that there was no motive to chill unionism at other company locations based on the evidence adduced before the ALJ, “because the [company] was unaware of ongoing union activity at any other terminal, nor did it believe that union organizing at any other terminal was imminently intended. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938, 944, 115 S. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:44 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property
Jury Reasonably Found No Patent Infringement In Suit Over Gem-Inscribing Laser Machinery
Lazare Kaplan International Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
Kaplan, No. 8:12-cv-1837-T-17MAP, 2013 WL 1193831, at *18 (M.D. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:27 am
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:42 am
Plaintiff Michael Kaplan is a member of 179-94 ST and plaintiff Yashar Foundation Inc. is the net lessee of the building. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 1:14 pm
Look to the experienced Oregon industrial accident attorneys at Kaplan Law LLC. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 6:18 am
Kaplan Early Learning Co., No. 11-cv-00353, 2016 U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 7:39 am
The rationale provided by the Majority in changing decades of case law (Chairman McFerran and Members Wilcox and Prouty, with Members Ring and Kaplan dissenting) was that this standard satisfies the Board’s statutory obligation to provide “meaningful, make-whole relief for losses incurred” as a result of the respondent’s unlawful conduct, and is consistent with the manner in which the Board has previously exercised its remedial authority under the Act. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 6:19 am
” The dissenting members (Ring and Kaplan) proposed adopting a rebuttable presumption standard, under which an employer’s failure to provide the Johnnie’s Poultry safeguards would be presumed coercive, but the employer would then be provided an opportunity to rebut that presumption by showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the questioning was not coercive under the totality of the circumstances. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
Then in Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:37 am
Lazare Kaplan International Inc. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:38 am
Kaplan Inc. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:55 am
Kaplan. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 10:50 am
As we previously predicted, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) issued its decision in American Steel Construction, Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
Kaplan has already ruled on what Trump can and cannot say. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
This action arose from allegations that BAR/BRI violated the federal antitrust laws by agreeing with Kaplan, Inc. to prevent competition in the market for full-service bar review courses. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:34 am
Among other cases denied review were a plea to clarify when individuals working as interns are entitled to get paid at the federal minimum wage level (Kaplan v. [read post]
