Search for: "L.R." Results 221 - 240 of 282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2016, 12:40 pm by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
L.R. has been exposed as a witness willing to withhold relevant information from the police, from the Crown and from the Court. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Alice Woolley
L.R. (5th) 1, 2011 ABCA 94 at paras 23-29; leave to SCC denied, [2011] SCCA No. 260 (QL). [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:35 pm
Udny (1886), L.R. 1 Sc. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 3:53 pm by Chuck Cosson
This blog moves from discussion of cases of justified and widely supported regulation to examine current topics that are more complex and more hotly contested. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 6:08 pm
Perhaps the most controversial provision of British Columbia’s new Wills, Estates and Succession Act coming into effect on March 31, 2014, is section 58 which will allow the Court to give effect as a will to a document, or an electronic record, that does not meet the formal criteria for a valid will in British Columbia, if the Court is satisfied that it represents the “testamentary intentions of a deceased person. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm
Goodfellow (1870), L.R. 5 Q.B. 549 at 565, which was adopted by Wilson J.A. in Re: Rogers (1963), 39 D.L.R. (2d) 141 (C.A.) at 148-49, 42 W.W.R. 200:It is essential to the exercise of such a power that a testator shall understand the nature of the act and its effects; shall understand the extent of the property of which he is disposing; shall be able to comprehend and appreciate the claims to which he ought to give effect; and, with a view to the latter object, that no disorder of the mind… [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 11:01 pm by Jan von Hein
Eyre (1870) L.R. 6 Q.B. 1.] despite being tempered by subsequent case law) is complex to interpret and does not resemble (structurally or linguistically) modern choice-of-law rules. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:41 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While 'stare decisis furnishes almost the same advantages as a class action', Weinstein, Revision of Procedure: Some Problems in Class Actions, 9 Buffalo L.R. 433, 446, there is an important difference: '* * * the Stare decisis doctrine is an elastic one allowing the litigant to challenge the soundness of an outstanding decision whereas, under the doctrine of Res judicata, the decision is binding even though it is plainly wrong', It is precisely this difference which… [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction In The Path of the Law, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., wrote, If you want to know the law and nothing else, you must look at it as a bad man, who cares only for the material consequences which such knowledge enables him to predict, not as a good one, who finds his reasons for conduct, whether inside the law or outside of it, in the vaguer sanctions of conscience. [read post]
L.R. 37 the configuration of various interests require to have regard not only to the interests of the accused: “While the law of Scotland has always very properly regarded fairness to an accused person as being an integral part of the administration of justice, fairness is not a unilateral consideration. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While 'stare decisis furnishes almost the same advantages as a class action', Weinstein, Revision of Procedure: Some Problems in Class Actions, 9 Buffalo L.R. 433, 446, there is an important difference: '* * * the Stare decisis doctrine is an elastic one allowing the litigant to challenge the soundness of an outstanding decision whereas, under the doctrine of Res judicata, the decision is binding even though it is plainly wrong', It is precisely this difference which… [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:36 am by K&L Gates
L.R. 7026-3 Discovery of Electronic Documents “(E-Discovery”) Middle District of Florida Civil Discovery Practice Handbook (see Part VII “Technology”) Southern District of Florida United States District Court for the S.D. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:34 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
We had, in the last seven posts on this topic, discussed the law pertaining to the power of an adjudicatory authority under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to award interim measures (by adjudicatory authority, we mean the courts and the arbitral tribunals). [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm by GWS Law
Parker v Butler [2016] EWHC 1251 (QB); [2016] 3 Costs L.R. 435 at [3-4, 17-20], Edis J: “In a case where a claimant has the benefit of qualified one-way costs shifting (‘QOCS’) at trial, is he subject to the ordinary rules as to costs on a first appeal to an appeal court at least where no other order is made under CPR r 52.9A? [read post]