Search for: "Mark A. Thomas" Results 221 - 240 of 6,793
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2020, 8:28 am
I'm reading the report at Fox News, which notes that Thomas had, before this morning, only spoken twice at oral argument since 2006.Thomas's questions today were about whether Booking.com could trademark "Booking.com": "Could Booking acquire an 800 number that's a vanity number, 1-800-booking for example, that is similar to 1-800-plumbing, which is a registered mark?... [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 5:32 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Supreme Court’s Conservatives Issued a Decision Too Extreme for Clarence Thomas; In a sweeping 5–4 decision, the court stripped Congress of its power to create new rights”: Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT June 27, 2008 THOMAS K. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm by Blue Blog
  The outpatient program referred to as Clinical Services is a licensed mental health Center and works with over 200 youth and families in Thomas County, Decatur County, Grady County, Brooks County and surrounding areas. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm by Buce
But Mark Thoma picked up a piece of  mine the other day on "who gets and who pays" in government social programs. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:08 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
Similarly, “Barton” dominated the mark THOMAS BARTON whereas the term “Thomas” served more as a modifier, emphasizing the “Barton” portion of the mark. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 6:04 am by Adam Weinstein
  Finally, in connection with eight customers Thomas improperly marked their penny stock trade tickets as unsolicited when they were actually solicited causing Lincoln Financial’s books and records to be incorrect. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:27 pm by Howard Bashman
Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “Supreme Court troubled by jury selection bias in Mississippi. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 3:49 am
Thomas McCarthy, 4 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 23:25 (5th ed. 2020). [read post]
8 May 2011, 9:25 pm by lawmrh
” A tip of the hat to Mark Brennan for updating me last week on the latest legal forays involving L’Affaire Gleason. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am by Eric Goldman
The Pruneyard decision may be a low-water mark for private property ownership rights, not the foundation of expanded censorship. [read post]