Search for: "Mr. Occupant" Results 221 - 240 of 2,627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Wisan’s actionsOn the question of right to occupancy, the court ruled in favor of the Cookes. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
While the result may seem unfair on Ms H, had Mr H remained in occupation and thereby become sole secure tenant, Ms H would also have had no security on his death. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
While the result may seem unfair on Ms H, had Mr H remained in occupation and thereby become sole secure tenant, Ms H would also have had no security on his death. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:20 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Answer So, to summarise, Mr K’s letting agent let him down by allowing a tenant who had not been properly referenced into occupation. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:20 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Answer So, to summarise, Mr K’s letting agent let him down by allowing a tenant who had not been properly referenced into occupation. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 11:49 am by SJM
Thirdly, on the challenge to the panel decision not to grant Mrs B a new tenancy, the judge found that the degree of under-occupation and the competing demands from others on the housing list were overriding considerations.Articles 8 and 14 ECHRThe judge found that there was nothing exceptional in the individual circumstances of this couple to bring their case over the seriously arguable threshold. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 11:49 am by SJM
Thirdly, on the challenge to the panel decision not to grant Mrs B a new tenancy, the judge found that the degree of under-occupation and the competing demands from others on the housing list were overriding considerations.Articles 8 and 14 ECHRThe judge found that there was nothing exceptional in the individual circumstances of this couple to bring their case over the seriously arguable threshold. [read post]