Search for: "State of Michigan Judicial Court" Results 221 - 240 of 2,253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2011, 11:37 am by Sarah Lindsey
The Michigan Supreme Court appointed Honorable Ann Mattson as Master to hear Formal Complaint No. 88 in In re Hon. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 1:40 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Several of the initial questions for Justice Kagan concerned the way the Court has changed since her days as a judicial clerk. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Mulligan (Michigan State University College of Law) has posted Federal Courts Not Federal Tribunals on SSRN. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:55 am by Nicole Vinson
Tri-State Insurance Company guided the Michigan Court, and evaluate the well-written concurring opinion that calls out State Farm and details the potential problems that would have developed had the Court bought State Farm’s ideas. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
State-based judicial determinations are reshaping the legal landscape by restricting abortion access previously assured under federal or state constitutional norms. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:12 am by Steven Gursten
One can also say that by removing the balance that existed in this state, it was the activist Republicans on the Michigan Supreme Court who also helped to create this PIP insurance fraud problem. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:04 am by Lindsay Offutt
A 16-state coalition filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump’s administration on Monday, requesting the court to issue a judicial determination that Trump’s national emergency declaration over the southern border wall is unconstitutional. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:26 am
 As we’ve said time and time again (and so has the Sixth Circuit when it’s not determined to rescue a plaintiff), it’s not the role of a federal court sitting in diversity to expand liability under state law where the state courts have not done so. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:04 am by Tom Kosakowski
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has unveiled an Ombudsperson Program for attorneys to raise issues about the Court or individual judges. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:41 am by James Segroves
However, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed an analogous situation in Bowen v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:39 am by Lawrence Solum
Because the Clause is directed primarily at commanding state courts to follow the supreme law when it conflicts with a nonsupreme law, a reasonable inference is that state courts are not bound by erroneous Supreme Court opinions. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:41 am by John Bursch
Responding to a recent article in the New York Times that called for states to select judges through merit-based appointments rather than through public elections, former Michigan Supreme Court Chief Justice Cliff Taylor wrote a letter to the editor endorsing public elections. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:26 pm by Jonathan
” The Court further found that because the State of Michigan was using the judicial process to exercise control over the Defendant’s property, it was using an “other legal process” to enforce the restitution order. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:52 am by Neumann Law Group
” The state high court also has held that the Michigan legislature has indicated that knowledge and time enough to repair are conclusively presumed when the defect has been readily apparent to an ordinary observer for 30 days or longer. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:13 pm
As the district court noted, Michigan has always been a strong “home rule” state, meaning that localities were traditionally entrusted with deciding important benefits and anti-discrimination protections for their own employees. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 12:57 pm
"Behind the low comedy, high stakes": Friday in The Detroit Free Press, columnist Brian Dickerson had an op-ed that begins, "When last we peeked in on the guardians of Michigan's judicial system, as I recall, they were rolling around on the floor of the state Supreme Court chamber, trading insults and eye-gouges in a disciplinary proceeding involving Geoffrey Fieger (who'd been hauled before them, ironically enough, for making unflattering… [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:59 pm by Matt Cooper
Maine An opinion by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in Jones v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:12 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
These groups now dominate judicial campaign expenditures in the states that have seen the most money – Alabama, Texas, Michigan, Ohio, and others. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 8:10 pm
  When the Michigan Supreme Court issued its nearly-incoherent opinion condemning Geoffrey Feiger for his unkind remarks about the rear ends of three judges of the state Court of Appeals, it declared that the performance of judicial responsibilitiesrequires a process in which the public can have the highest sense of confidence, ... [read post]