Search for: "Superior Well Services, Inc. " Results 221 - 240 of 1,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 4:03 pm by M. Brandon Smith
"We are conducting an internal investigation to determine how Superior Transportation Group, Inc. in Atlanta, was involved. [read post]
4 May 2008, 8:41 am
The company bought the 53-acre property just west of Interstate 469 and intended to build a Flying J Travel Plaza, as well as other retail, commercial and professional services. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
In an 85-page opinion filed March 25, and modified and certified for partial publication on April 23, 2021, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Napa County Superior Court’s judgment denying a writ petition challenging the County’s EIR and approvals for an expansion of Syar Industries, Inc. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:37 pm by Lax & Neville LLP
The FINRA Complaint alleged that the day after Waszolek was named the Widow’s residual beneficiary, he resigned from UBS Financial Services, Inc. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 1:48 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
Furry Babies Stratford Square, Inc., No. 13-3592, slip op. at 9 (Ill. 18th Jud. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 7:41 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Two recent cases out of Ontario’s Superior Court, Papp v Stokes Economic Consulting Inc., (Papp) and Kanak v Riggin, (Kanak), provide guidance to employers on avoiding liability when giving employment references. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Sheppard Mullin
Plaintiff asserted that its product was superior to defendants’ equipment, which employed a conventional destructive testing technique, because plaintiff’s method was non-destructive and allowed testing of in-service pipelines, and because the testing was faster. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:00 am by Sara Josselyn
Takeaway In order to avoid wrongful dismissal damages, employers who are the selling party in an M&A transaction would be well advised to ensure that, if an offer is made to the employees to continue employment with the buyer, that the offer is left open after any official termination, that the offer is not contingent on a release, and that the buyer recognizes the employees’ years of service when the business is sold as a going concern. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:41 pm by HRWatchdog
At this time, AB 5 is the only legislative vehicle still in play regarding Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]