Search for: "THOMAS W. B. LONG"
Results 221 - 240
of 423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
§ 812(b)(1)(B). [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
W. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm
[b.] [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Hansen.Salerno, Thomas J.Washington, DC : BeardBooks, c2010.Banks and BankingK1066 .F45 2007International banking regulation / by Carl Felsenfeld.Felsenfeld, Carl.Huntington, N.Y. : Juris Pub., c2007.BiographyE902 .P695 2010The presidency of George W. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:38 am
W. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
THOMAS E. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
John B. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
Thomas. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
After that, Prof Thomas F. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
So long as it stands, however, the boundaries of inter- national society stand with it.4 These structures of construction, in turn, serve as a proxy for a complex and deeply embedded ideology of politics—bound to blood and territory—that serves as the foundation of political, economic, social and cultural theory. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 7:00 am
B. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
In the national government, if the Senate should be divided, no appointment could be made; in the government of New York, if the council should be divided, the governor can turn the scale, and confirm his own nomination.[3]At face value, Hamilton seemed to believe (a) that there may be a divided Senate in the appointments context; and (b) that a tie in the Senate defeats a President’s nomination. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:01 am
Notes:[1] W. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
B. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:52 am
”); Thomas v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
B. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 4:42 am
W. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
(see Adam Mossoff, “Who Cares What Thomas Jefferson Thought About Patents? [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
In the McGahn oral argument, Judge Thomas Griffith, an appointee of George W. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
Before getting to all of that, here's one other noteworthy development: In October, the New England Journal of Medicine published a study indicating that teenagers' cost-free access to long-acting, reversible contraceptive methods, including intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants, can have a dramatic impact on the rates of unwanted pregnancies, births and abortions.I. [read post]
