Search for: "Unknown Defendants 1 -10"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2022, 9:08 am
Jane Doe, Defendant," and it contains no identifying or contact information for Doe. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
The claimants sued the defendant under s.1, 1972 Act. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
The claimants sued the defendant under s.1, 1972 Act. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 3:12 pm
The high court stated: "...relationship is a shorthand description of four factors: (1) reasonable foreseeability of the injury, (2) likelihood of the injury, (3) magnitude of the burden of guarding against the injury, and (4) consequences of placing burden on defendant." 973 N.E. 2d 880, 888. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:00 am
For instance, a plaintiff who nonsuits only after "discovery reveals previously unknown flaws in the plaintiff's claims" likely has not done so to avoid an unfavorable ruling on the merits. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
., 2011 NY Slip Op 4720, 1 (N.Y. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:24 am
The order is below.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------VICTOR P ALAGUACHI, DANIEL GALDAME, and MARCO MOROCHO, on behalf ofthemselves and other employees similarly situated, Plaintiffs, -against-ALL CITY REMODELING, INC., T &G CONTRACTING INC., GEORGE TSIMOYIANIS, and JOHN DOES 1-100, the actual names ofsuch individuals or entities being unknown, Defendants. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:53 am
Unknown actors reportedly attempted to assassinate high-profile Donetsk People’s Republic (DNR) Supreme Court Judge Aleksandr Nikulin. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 5:41 am
Here’s how Mark Steyn pithily summarizes the developments: 1. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:06 pm
Specifically, it was pointed out that two power poles and their lines protruded above the maximum 20-1 slope required by Florida Statutes. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
"Significantly, the Court of Appeals said that "[t]he decision whether to defend and indemnify a police officer is typically made by the Board at the beginning of litigation or upon discovery of facts previously unknown — long before the facts are litigated and a judgment of punitive damages is ever rendered. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:09 am
In 2014, the plaintiff commenced this action, alleging that Malka had lied on her 2011 statement of net worth by stating that the value of her interest in certain family assets was unknown, and that, by certifying the statement of net worth, the defendants had violated Judiciary Law § 487. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
The plaintiff also alleged that Schneider National was a business entity of unknown form that was also domiciled in California. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:59 am
In addition, the third cause of action in the instant complaint alleges fraud against all defendants and states that "defendants severally and jointly, engaged in fraud designed to deceive the plaintiffs by misappropriating funds duly owed to them by acting as purchasers in transaction 1 and immediately reselling the premises in transaction 2. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:29 pm
The amount in controversy is unknown at this time, so the second factor weighs in favor of Folino, who avers that unknown damages cannot justify exorbitant discovery requests. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:29 pm
The amount in controversy is unknown at this time, so the second factor weighs in favor of Folino, who avers that unknown damages cannot justify exorbitant discovery requests. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:30 pm
The action was commenced on January 1, 1987 when the defendant was arraigned on felony and misdemeanor charges. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:55 pm
Unknown to the plaintiffs, the sandwich that the defendant had manufactured, distributed and sold to them, and that JB thereafter consumed at the defendant’s restaurant, was contaminated by Shigella sonnei, a potentially lethal bacteria. 2.2.2 On or about February 27, 2010, JB began to exhibit signs of discomfort and illness. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:02 pm
Whether or not the People did so and did so with a certified record is unknown. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
(1) Plaintiff stated claim for a free speech violation where Sheriff allegedly interfered with legal mail; defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity; (2) Qualified immunity applied to alleged Fourth Amendment violation; other claims were waived Haze v. [read post]
