Search for: "DOES 1-19" Results 2501 - 2520 of 19,424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2020, 10:29 am by Frank Weberndörfer
  Does the employer have the right to ask questions regarding an identified COVID-19 infection? [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Thirty-two states are acting to pass laws or regulations to require sales tax collection by remote sellers now or in the immediate future: Preexisting prior to Wayfair: Pennsylvania & Rhode Island (both give retailers a choice between collecting tax or complying with notice-and-reporting laws) July 1, 2018: Colorado (notice-and-reporting only), Hawaii, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Vermont September 1, 2018: Mississippi October 1, 2018: Alabama, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky,… [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 12:12 am by Neil Wilkof
This broad statement seems incorrect.Under the relevant provision of Swiss law (Art. 19(1)(a) Copyright Act), any "personal use of a work or use within a circle of persons closely connected to each other" is lawful. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:57 am by info@thomasjhenrylaw.com
Rick Perry May 19, 2011 Goes into effect September 1, 2011 Bill would create a $10,000 civil penalty for violating barratry laws Important Sections SECTION 2. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 3:11 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
Neither the language of an employment agreement, nor the label an employer places on an employee, determines eligibility for unemployment benefits; rather, it is the substance of the business relationship which does. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-5410Issues: (1) Does the “use of force” clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:40 am
The plaintiffs bar has read this portion of the opinion to suggest that, where there is no finding of comparative negligence on a plaintiff, the Fair Share Act does not apply and the case reverts back to the old joint and several law under which a plaintiff could recover the entire verdict against any defendant even if that defendant was only found to be 1% responsible.In contrast, the defense bar has asserted that this part of the Spencer v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 7:20 pm by Ilya Somin
The Takings Clause generally does not provide compensation in such cases. [read post]