Search for: "C.D. EXPRESS, INC."
Results 241 - 260
of 342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
Wyeth Inc., 2008 WL 2856146 (N.J. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Puig, CV 20-11064 FMO, 2021 WL 4557229, *3, n.3 (C.D. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
Inspire Charter Schools (C.D. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 7:06 am
(C.D. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:41 am
Hostess Brands, Inc., Case No. 2:10-cv-02303-CBM-VBK (C.D. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
Bridgeport Music, Inc., No. 13-06004 (C.D. [read post]
Legal rules, convenient fictions, and figuring out when you've agreed to something you haven't read.
14 Sep 2009, 7:26 am
Hach Co., No. 09-1110 (pdf) (C.D. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:25 pm
(C.D. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 7:30 am
Supp. 1526, 1536 (C.D. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 10:38 pm
Federal Express Corporation, et al., 2008 WL 906517 (C.D. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am
The Fifth Circuit wrote, for example, that “non-actionable ‘puffery’ comes in at least two possible forms: (1) an exaggerated, blustering, and boasting statement upon which no reasonable buyer would be justified in relying; or (2) a general claim of superiority over comparable products that is so vague that it can be understood as nothing more than a mere expression of opinion. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
The first, known as the idea/expression dichotomy,8 “distinguishes between ideas and expression and makes only the latter eligible for copyright protection. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:10 pm
LEXIS 154750 (C.D. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:28 pm
Supp. 2d 1197, 1209-10 (C.D. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 5:56 pm
LEXIS 44872 (C.D. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 5:56 pm
LEXIS 44872 (C.D. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:39 am
Supp.2d ___, 2008 WL 999058, at *7 (C.D. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:13 pm
(C.D. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., ___ F. [read post]