Search for: "D. E.G. Y." Results 241 - 260 of 728
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2009, 3:07 am
As far as I can tell, the intangible property U.S. criminal law protects is really property that has value only in the real-world: e.g., passwords to access accounts on a corporate computer system, trade secrets, etc. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:22 pm by Russell Knight
“[B]y postponing the division of the pension until it is received, both parties shared the risk [the state employee] would change jobs or die before retiring, which would reduce the pension substantially or forfeit its benefits completely. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by News Desk
In addition, failure of the owner, operator, or agent in charge of a covered facility to comply with the preventive control’s provisions of the CGMP & PC rule (located in subparts A, C, D, E, F, and G of Part 117) is prohibited by section 301(uu) of the Act (21 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:32 pm by Daniel Shaviro
  Obviously, there are other issues here (e.g., Reuven Avi-Yonah argues for taxation at the entity level given managerial / governance issues). [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:39 pm by Jon L. Gelman
•    A year into the pandemic with a re-established supply chain that includes increased US production, CDC must direct healthcare organizations to stop all contingency and crisis practices (e.g. decontamination of N95 FFRs and use of non-respirator face-pieces such as surgical masks in place of respiratory protection), and expand its recommendations for respiratory protection to include all workers in healthcare and related sectors, not just those with… [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 8:14 am by Gritsforbreakfast
DNA testing looks at two metrics on X and Y axes: Whether alleles are present at various loci, and the quantity of DNA available for testing at that spot. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
 When P1 sues D, that doesn't stop P2 from suing D. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
If there is a particular way of showing that (e.g., it's the first article to discuss how case X and doctrine Y interact), please let us know. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 7:57 am
If you sacrifice X for Y, make sure Y is more valuable than X. [read post]