Search for: "DOES 1-98 " Results 241 - 260 of 2,161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
(2) If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, must it then be accepted that in circumstances such as those in the case at issue, the mere presence in a Member State of such goods (which have been placed under a duty suspension arrangement in that Member State) does not prejudice, or cannot prejudice, the functions of the trade mark, with the result that the trade mark proprietor which invokes national trade mark rights in that Member State cannot oppose that presence? [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
” (para 98) As such, it would lack distinctiveness, at least for Class 25 goods.CommentReaders might recall that, last summer, The IPKat reported on the then fresh GC decision relating the Guerlain’s Rouge G lipstick shape mark and regarded it as offering some hope for those seeking to register less conventional signs. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 11:30 pm by Rumpole
And here's what FN (1) is: "And we mean it this time." [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 10:24 pm
  Now, to be clear, the bill is a Resolution and even if passed, does not become law. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 12:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
The agency does not release the names of the banks on its “problem” list.) [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:23 am by Kate Fort
These are standard state court ICWA cases, and does not include any of the ongoing federal litigation. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm by Wolfgang Demino
In its motion for rehearing, Orca contends that a disclaimer of warranty "does not transform an instrument into a quitclaim deed. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:15 pm
(Then again does, 98-year-old conference chair Tom Hansen know how to do anything? [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:22 am
McDermott, Inc., 827 F.2d 1040, 1043 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1075, 108 S.Ct. 1052, 98 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1988) ("Rule 60(b)(1) does allow relief from final judgments on account of 'mistake,' and, in this circuit, the rule may be invoked for the correction of judicial error, but only to rectify an obvious error of law, apparent on the record. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It is not enough to argue that the claim should be read in a particular way when the wording of the claim does not require this. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 8:43 pm by Mathews P. George
However, the plaintiff was the prior user of the mark since 1997-98. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 11:12 am by Sarah Wells
On September 22, 2015, Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell announced that the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) does not warrant protection under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). [read post]