Search for: "Doe No. 1."
Results 241 - 260
of 168,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2023, 8:43 am
Art. 41(1) CDR does not mention patents but only designs and utility models. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:31 am
Does 1-90, a mass John Doe case based on alleged BitTorrent downloads of a movie, pending in the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, the Court, by Hon. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:56 am
LEXIS 1 (January 3, 2008): It must be acknowledged, of course, that an individual who has been instructed by a police officer to perform field sobriety tests has the power to prevent the tests by refusing to cooperate, but that power does not equate to a constitutional right to refuse. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:17 am
In an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that the media does not have a constitutional right to protect its sources. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 8:52 am
In the last few days we have provided an overview of what a Form K-1 does, reviewed why your basis... [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 3:45 am
Does 1-22, 1:08-cv-00066-S-DLM (D. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
This blog entry was originally posted on 9/1/17. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:00 am
Weithorn (University of California Hastings), When Does a Minor's Legal Competence to Make Health Care Decisions Matter? [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 6:32 am
New York recognizes conversion claims based on intangible property, such as electronically stored information or trade secrets.[1] But does a conversion claim exist when the theft of the intangible property does not deprive the rightful owner of unfettered access to the property (i.e., when the owner retains an original or accurate duplicate of the information)? [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:02 am
The full guidance has more in-depth answers, but the high level overview:1. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:59 am
Does 1–3757, 2011 U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:06 am
Does 1-16, the case targeting students at the University of New Mexico, Magistrate Judge Garcia issued an order which required the RIAA to:--provide full sets of papers for each John Doe defendant, and--give the defendants 40 days in which to review the papers with their counsel, and, if so advised, to oppose discovery.September 9, 2007, Order, Requiring 40 days Notice and Full Sets of Papers for John Doe defendants** Document published online at Internet Law… [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:40 am
§ 701(b)(1)(G). [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 6:19 am
This is from the Korea - Radionuclides panel report circulated last week: 7.9.5.1 Does Annex C(1)(g) impose a positive obligation? [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:16 am
Kingdom Trust Company; PENSCO Trust Company; John Does 1-25., 2017-1336. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 10:21 am
A number of websites were talking about Old Navy selling US flag tee shirts on July 3, 2009 for $1.00.Dropped by the store in Watchung, New Jersey and was told that this sale was only going on in Canada (which does celebrate "Canada Day" on July 1, presumably without US flags and likely not interested in flag tees 2 days after Canada Day).The "Canada" explanation does not pass the "straight face" test of Professor Dennis Hutchinson, but… [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 2:17 pm
Department of Energy (DOE) has issued an order (1) vacating Excelerate Liquefaction Solutions I, LLC’s (ELS) authorization to export LNG from its proposed terminal in Calhoun County, Texas to nations with a Free Trade Agreement with the United States and (2) granting withdrawal of ELS’s pending application to export LNG to non-FTA nations. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:25 pm
So does this mean that all loans are securities transactions? [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:30 pm
Department of Energy (DOE) has issued an order: (1) vacating Pangea LNG (North America) Holdings’ (Pangea) authority to export LNG to nations with a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the United States from Pangea’s proposed South Texas LNG Export Project, (2) withdrawing Pangea’s pending Non-FTA export application, and (3) vacating DOE’s notice authorizing a change in control. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
P. 17(a)(1) ("An action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest. [read post]
