Search for: "Does 1 - 35"
Results 241 - 260
of 9,723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2011, 4:09 am
What does that mean in this context? [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm
"Medical Accreditation for Foreign-Educated Refugees: An Undue Burden," Brigham Young University Prelaw Review, vol. 36, no. 1 (2022) [full-text] "Non-refoulement, Withholding, and Private Persecution," Louisiana Law Review, vol. 8, no. 3 (Spring 2022) [full-text]"Non-State Actors 'Under Color of Law': Closing a Gap in Protection Under the Convention Against Torture, Harvard Human Rights Journal, vol. 35 (Spring 2022)… [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:04 am
The post Paragraph IV to Paragraph III Conversion Does Not Deprive a District Court of Subject Matter Jurisdiction in Hatch-Waxman Cases appeared first on IP Law Alert. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 11:00 pm
Is the court second seised, when making its decision under Article 27(1) of Regulation No 44/2001, and hence before the question of jurisdiction is decided by the court first seised, obliged to ascertain whether the court first seised lacks jurisdiction because of Article 22(1) of Regulation No 44/2001, because such lack of jurisdiction of the court first seised would, under Article 35(1) of Regulation No 44/2001, lead to a judgment of the court first seised… [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:56 am
The court denied in part defendant's request for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 4:20 am
The SEC's Reg Flex Agenda: What Does It Really Mean? [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 2:17 am
How does this compare to 2019? [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:39 am
., "radical left").In the 5-and-1/2-page letter, the author (a former presidential candidate) achieved no fewer than 35 instances of such name-calling.My favorite passage was the following three-fer:"Why should we care what the crazy left does? [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 7:22 am
TapLogic, LLC, 1-15-cv-00026 (INND January 16, 2018, Order) (Springmann, USDJ) [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:03 am
Even though claim 1 itself does not provide a detailed explanation of how packet headers are used to allocate the bandwidth, the inventive concept lies in the limitation of using packet headers to allocate bandwidth, not in the details of implementation. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 8:15 am
Specifically, the district court found that: (1) these claim limitations of the patents-in-suit are in means-plus-function format under Section 112 ¶ 6 and (2) the specification does not disclose sufficient structure corresponding to the recited functions. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 12:28 am
For the foregoing reasons, wevacate and remand the district court’s judgment of invalidity as to claims 7, 12, 35, 37 and 58 of the ’533 patent, claims 18, 34 and 55 of the ’125 patent, claims 5 and 34 ofthe ’357 patent and claims 1 and 22 of the ’842 patent. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
This is possible thanks to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C). [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:37 am
In Ex parte KIKINIS , the Board affirmed the rejection of the examiner under 35 USC 102(e).The issueWe consider Appellant’s arguments seriatim as they are presented inthe principal Brief, pages 5-7, Reply Br. 1-4.Dispositive Issue: Has Appellant shown that the Examiner erred infinding that Arsenault describes in response to storing, in its entirety, in a data storage area, received programming information, a user device continuously scans the data storage area to remove… [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:51 pm
However, Simister doesteach the claimed deferral of calculations until receipt of a request to updatethe display from the timing means.Thus, we are constrained by the record to reverse the Examiner’srejection of independent claims 1 and 6-8 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:22 am
This is slightly less than 1 tbsp of whipped cream cheese which has about 35 calories. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:32 am
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
“The prior art’s mere disclosure of more than one alternative does not constitute a teaching away from any of these alternatives because such disclosure does not criticize, discredit, or otherwise discourage the solution claimed. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm
§ 3742(a)(1).Issue:* Whether district courts may consider factors beyond substantial assistance in ruling on a Rule 35(b) motion to reduce sentence, and if such factors may be considered, how do they impact the extent of any reduction.Analysis:* Text of rule does not tell whether it authorizes district courts to look to § 3553(a) factors in deciding the extent of a reduction. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:26 pm
As we reported earlier, the Senate’s Committee on the Judiciary, has issued its draft report on the Patent Reform bill (S. 1145), to amend the patent laws currently in Title 35 of the United States Code. [read post]
