Search for: "Does 1-32"
Results 241 - 260
of 5,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2018, 4:50 pm
(...)CALL/ACBD has directly addressed Parliament twice on the question of the interpretation of these very words, and since 2009 has made a total of at least three consistent statements in favour of the position that Crown copyright should not or does not apply to primary law.In advance of the 2012 Copyright Act amendments, CALL/ACBD, submitted a letter to the Bill C-32 review committee. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:35 pm
See Waggoner, supra, at 30-32. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:14 am
Code §32-7-1 et seq. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:14 am
Code §32-7-1 et seq. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:14 am
Code §32-7-1 et seq. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 10:17 am
Where there are specific provisions in Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 118E, Sections 31 and 32 governing estate recovery, the agency is limited to these provisions of law. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 2:59 pm
In the six months ending December 2003 net loss was $(176) million and the six months ending June 2003, net income was $32 million. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 10:11 am
Individuals may seek expungement of arrests occurring at any time before or after the statutes' effective date of July 1, 2010. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
The document does not explicitly indicate how this substance was produced or which ingredients it contains. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:16 pm
Thus, in the first deed, the grantor thought they were conveying 1/4 of their 1/8 mineral interest, or 1/32. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
When Does Child Support Really End? [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:23 pm
Legal Reasoning (Clevenger and Prost)Claim Feature at issue"Claim 32 recited the method of claim 1 wherein the teat seal canal had an 'an acriflavine-free' formulation. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:15 pm
As to amendment:Because we find each of claims 1–32 unpatentable, we next addressPatent Owners’ motion to amend, in which claims 33–64 are proposed.Motions to amend are permitted by 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:08 am
See, for instance, FCI v, Evdomen Corp (1999) 2 SCC 446, Cursetji Jamshedji v RD Shiralee AIR 1943 Bom 32, Jindal Vijaynagar Steel (JSW Steel) v Jindal Praxair Oxygen (2006) 11 SCC 521. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Section 68.2(1) does not provide a collective infringement remedy.[8] The result was that the Supreme Court found that Access Copyright could not enforce its tariffs against non-licensees, such as York, and, further, since Access Copyright does not have an assignment of copyright from the copyright owners, Access Copyright could not sue York for any alleged infringement. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 3:04 pm
Even if Seattle does not have as much snow as other cities in Washington, snowfall is not out of the question. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:18 am
However, does such interest amount to a human right guaranteed by the ECHR? [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:56 am
" There's an immediate, warm laugh from the assembly, and the instant he hears it, his face shows gratification:He really does feed off the energy of the crowd. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 3:35 am
And laches does not apply to a trespass-to-try-title claim. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 1:45 pm
.:31-32-4-2. [read post]
