Search for: "Does 1-44"
Results 241 - 260
of 4,288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2014, 11:00 pm
Is Article 27(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 not applicable for the court second seised if the court second seised comes to the conclusion that the court first seised lacks jurisdiction because of Article 22(1) of Regulation No 44/2001? [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
P. 44 (Rule 504-1(4)(b)). [read post]
25 May 2009, 10:07 am
If the answer to question 1 is in the negative: Does a claim falling under Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001 arise if the claim for payment of the prize was not made conditional upon ordering goods but the recipient of the communication has actually placed an order for goods? [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
P. 44 (Rule 504-1(4)(b)). [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
After you send the payment follow the next steps: Fax the Western Union receipt at +44 2080434497 ! [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 6:49 am
"The applicant conceded that claims 1 and 32 from U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:33 am
" And so, the Board affirmed the refusal to register SOHO INK for the applicant's Class 2, 8, and 44 goods and services. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:52 am
A bit perplexed as to what it could or should do, the Rechtbank ‘s-Gravenhage decided to stay the proceedings and asked the CJEU for a preliminary ruling on the following questions: ‘Regarding Article 6(1) of [Regulation 44/2001]: 1. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 7:46 am
" Roychowdhury and Simkin found the answer to be 1 in 10^500, or effectively, zero. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 8:35 am
Amazon does not retain any right to issue directions to the affiliate. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 8:18 pm
” does not mean they are exempt. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:16 am
It's a problem solved: we no longer have to worry about Solvency II coming into force on 1 November 2012, revoking Solvency I and creating a vacuum as it does so.But it does create a set of other problems: we already know there isn't enough time for the European Institutions to finalise Omnibus II and for the Member States to transpose the new regime by 30 June. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:15 am
While the grounds to challenge a prenuptial agreement vary state-to-state, here are five items that could precipitate a challenge: 1. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 11:22 am
In my view, that does not assist. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 1:10 am
As said, the ECJ’s ruling does not come as a surprise. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:34 am
"The Board looked to the way a Section 44(e) registration is treated vis-a-vis abandonment, since a Section 44(e) registration may also be obtained without use prior to registration. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
§ 41.50(b), we enter NEW GROUNDS OF REJECTION against: (1) claims 32, 43,and 44 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
§ 41.50(b), we enter NEW GROUNDS OF REJECTION against: (1) claims 32, 43,and 44 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 9:16 am
For example, claim 44, whichcontains a laundry list of diseases and conditions, dependson “any one of claims 1–43. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:55 am
Source: Tax Foundation Alabama 39 20 30 48 15 12 Alaska 2 25 1 5 23 35 Arizona 27 17 19 47 5 13 Arkansas 46 40 40 44 26 34 California 49 31 49 43 14 17 Colorado 18 16 14 38 12 40 Connecticut 47 29 43 30 50 23 Delaware 11 50 41 2 9 3 Florida 4 6 1 22 11 2 Georgia 33 8 38 29 24 38 Hawaii 38 14 47 24 16 26 Idaho 21 26 23 26 4 48 Illinois 36 39 13 36 45 42 Indiana 10 18 15 12 2 11 Iowa 45 48 42 19 39 33 Kansas 28 34 21 31 20 15 Kentucky 23 27 17 14 35 47 Louisiana 44… [read post]
