Search for: "Does 1-67" Results 241 - 260 of 2,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2008, 3:19 am
It also cites an AARP survey found 1 in 10 borrowers were urged to use loan proceeds to purchase investments. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm by Eric Goldman
Doe No. 1 is distinguishable because the plaintiffs’ claims focused on Backpage’s posting standards. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 5:26 am by admin
  To avoid this potential problem and a denial of the F-1 student but you must enter the U.S. on a B-2 to either look at schools or prepare for filing the F-1 a good idea would be to notify the consular office that issued your B-2 visa to mark you visa as a “B-2 visa/Prospective Student”  According to 67 Fed.Reg. 18065 a B-2 Visa will not be able to be adjusted to an F-1 Visa if it does not have the prospective student marking. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
Turning to B's reliance upon section 67 of the Act (which was abandoned in the Lesotho case), the judge held that it was "plain" that it could not be invoked and that "an error in the application of the chosen law does not involve a lack of substantive jurisdiction as it is defined in the Act. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:48 pm by Brian Shiffrin
But there are some kinds of challenges for cause for which that “expurgatory oath” does not work. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:10 pm by wweigler
      Injunctive Relief The fining process does not always cause the violations to stop, and certainly does not cause the violations to stop immediately. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:50 pm by Administrator
Mernagh 2013 ONCA 67[1] This is the third time in just over a decade that this court has dealt with the issue of medical marihuana. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:00 am by Marcel Pemsel
Consequently, the inconsistency one might find to exist between the reasoning of the decision (in paras. 61 and 66, summarised in the list numbered (1) to (4) above) and the official answer (in para. 67, summarised in the list numbered (a) to (d) above), namely that the CJEU mentioned Sentic’s vendors’ assurances as a relevant factor only in the official answer but not in the reasoning, seems irrelevant. 4. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:16 am by Dianne Saxe
Metals Table 1* (Background) for Agricultural soils Table 2** (health protective) standards for Agricultural soils Aerobic Compost Guidelines*** (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Arsenic 11 11 13 Cadmium 1 1 3 Chromium (total) 67 160 210 Cobalt 19 22 34 Copper 62 140 100 Lead 45 45 150 Mercury 0.16 0.25 0.8 Molybdenum 2 6.9 5 Nickel 37 130 62 Selenium 1.2 2.4 2 Zinc 290 340 500 *Table 1: Full depth background site condition standards. … [read post]