Search for: "Does 1-68"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
The question arises as to whether the behaviour of the ED in the proceedings up to refusal deprived the applicant of the right to be heard (A 113(1)), and whether the decision was sufficiently reasoned (R 68(2)). [4.3] Decision T 939/92 referred to by the appellant in the statement of grounds of appeal (followed for instance in T 1242/04 [9.2]) sets out that A 54(2) does not limit the state of the art to written disclosure in specific documents. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:33 am
The relation back doctrine cannot apply in an FLSA collective action because a Rule 23 class has independent legal status, whereas an FLSA collective class does not. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:39 pm
Dickinson, 348 Mass. 767, 767-68 (1964), Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
If anyone does not want PACE changed in the way proposed by Deputy Commissioner Mackey, therefore, they should tell the Home Office. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 10:04 pm
All stakeholders need to drop their cognitive dissonance and fix this broken model. 1. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:22 pm
Macklem, supra, at 68. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:22 pm
Macklem, supra, at 68. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:51 pm
Macklem, supra, at 68. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 10:32 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:08 pm
The presumption under subsection (f) does not apply if there is: (1) a court order under subsection (b); or(2) a signed record that satisfies subsection (e)(1). 66 (h) [When Posthumously Conceived Gestational Child Treated as in Gestation.] [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:10 pm
The IPKat didn't see this one coming because it isn't really an IP case at all -- though it seems to him that it does have repercussions for IP in a big way. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:22 am
A third problem with this proposal that the Subcommittee does not address is that some defendants use the offer of judgment for its cost-shifting provision. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:39 am
Generally, “[A] court of this state has jurisdiction to make an initial child custody determination only if: (1) This state is the home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or was the home state of the child within six months before the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from this state but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in this state; (2) A court of another state does not have jurisdiction under… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:21 pm
On (1) and (2) the European Court found that, following Case C? [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:29 am
Putnam, 841 N.W.2d 68, 78 (Iowa 2013). [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:35 am
Now does the future look brighter according to the GAO? [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:49 am
Oklahoma’s Insurance Business Transfer Act (“IBTA”) became effective on November 1, 2018. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 9:00 am
Two other comments were also received after the posting had been closed but were still considered. 1. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 12:34 pm
In a matter of great importance to animal advocates, voters in Springfield, Missouri, shot down Question 1, which would have banned the ownership of pit bull-type dogs within city limits, with about 68 percent siding with the “No” vote. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:36 am
In a vote, a motion to amend the Society's constitution to establish a Council of 46 members, down from 62, was backed by 68 solicitors, with two against and three abstentions. [read post]
