Search for: "Does 1-89"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2020, 12:34 am
W 11/89, OJ 1993, 225, point 4.1; W 6/97, point 6.3; T 173/06, point 8; T 1888/09, point 2.1). [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In the decision under appeal it was held that it does, because the subject-matter of claim 1 cannot claim priority from the US application No. 835,799 […]. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 8:07 am
But what does that mean? [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 12:31 pm
As ‘Concerned Observer’ wrote, for instance: ‘I can understand the train of thought (I hesitate to call it “logic”) in attempting to rely upon Art. 89(1) UPCA to solve the problem with the PAP. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:48 am
" Here is the IPKat's translation of the German version of the CJ's response: "Article 5(1)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark is entitled to prohibit an advertiser from advertising, on the basis of a keyword identical that trade mark which that advertiser has, without the consent of that proprietor,… [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 12:31 pm
As ‘Concerned Observer’ wrote, for instance: ‘I can understand the train of thought (I hesitate to call it “logic”) in attempting to rely upon Art. 89(1) UPCA to solve the problem with the PAP. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 10:51 am
Only one more year of having to deal with this nonsense (12/12/12) and then the human race does not have to deal with this again for another 89 years. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The proposal does not involve any loss of rights for the applicant. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:00 pm
§ 636(b)(1)). [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:30 am
"Is there use for the purposes of Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 89/104/EEC where a third party provides as a keyword to a search engine operator a sign which is identical with a trade mark, without the consent of the proprietor of that trade mark, so that, on inputting the sign identical with the trade mark as a search term into the search engine, an electronic promotional link to the third party's website advertising identical goods or services appears in an advertising… [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 11:31 am
First, does the work you were doing qualify? [read post]
29 May 2008, 12:55 am
_uacct = "UA-1069395-1"; urchinTracker(); [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:00 am
App. at 89. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:32 pm
The four big banks, BankofAmerica, Chase, Citi and Wells Fargo, converted fewer than 1%, fewer than 1%, 4% and 11% of their temporary mods, respectively. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:27 am
A new referral is pending before the EBO (G 1/10). [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:53 am
In other words, the "use of force does not necessarily entail physical restraint. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
The Board, however, does not agree with this argument. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
Arguments: The respondent (Kalathil) argued that the party’s counsel has implied authority to consent to arbitration on behalf of the party.Decision: The Supreme Court set aside the arbitral award holding that oral consent given by counsel without written memos of instruction from parties does not fulfil the requirement under section 89 of the CPC (Afcons Infrastructure). [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 1:23 pm
Ava Gardner 89. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:35 am
The range did not therefore result from an arbitrary selection.The range indicated in claim 1 was also narrow compared to the possible range for the device shown in figure 1 of E1.The range had to be appreciated also in combination with feature 3 of claim 1 which recited: "an electric power storage device (20) connected to the terminals in parallel with the fuel cell". [read post]
