Search for: "In Re: v. In Re:"
Results 241 - 260
of 62,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Braddock v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:48 pm
V. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
NO-FAULT - TESTIMONY OF RE-PEER REVIEW DOCTOR - GENERALLY ACCEPTED STANDARDS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE - MEDICAL NECESSITY Prime Psychological Servs., P.C. a/a/o James Gajadhar v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 8:16 am
BIC UK Ltd v Burgess [2019] – employer appeal successful: retrospective amendment re-wrote history to an impermissible extent The Court of Appeal (CA) has unanimously ruled that a retrospective amendment to the deed and rules of the BIC UK Pension Scheme (the Scheme) was invalid. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:19 am
In re Charit-Email Technology Partnership LLP; Vermillion International Investments Ltd v Charit-Email Technology Partnership LLP; [2009] WLR (D) 57 “Although the interests and liabilities of a member of a limited liability partnership were different from those of a contributory to a limited company and those differences might lead to some changes in practice so far as [...] [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 10:16 am
But that situation seems more like Bush v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
" The Appeals Court held that a jury cannot be called back to re-deliberate once a verdict has been accepted. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:19 pm
What we're waiting for: The Supreme Court's decisions in Miller v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:03 pm
Check the Maryland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:50 pm
On October 30, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a landmark decision in In re Bilski. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:33 pm
Here is the abstract: In the most important ruling ever on causation and standard-setting, In re Rambus, the D.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Mehedi’s request to re-open his case. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 1:51 pm
Jordan v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 8:11 am
Applying Hildebrand v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 2:19 pm
Sellers in the above examples will want the opposite.The "crystal ball" for the above referenced rule of thumb is the Ohio Supreme Court's ruling in Berea Bd. of Edn. v Cuyahoga Cty Bd. of Revision, 23 Ohio St. 3d 59 (2005). [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 5:01 am
”See In re Hauserman, Inc., 892 F.2d 1049, 15 USPQ2d 1157, 1158 (Fed.Cir. 1989) (unpublished)(quoting Arvin Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 7:49 pm
More fighting re HD claims, this time re Comcast's allegation that it provides a better HD image. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:12 am
The case of Re W (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 999, decided today, involved a father's successful appeal against the dismissal of his application for direct contact with his daughters. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 1:52 pm
The Delaware Chancery Court recently rejected most of a motion for re-argument of a ruling in which it had found an attorney-client and work-product privilege log deficiently documented in expedited litigation over a non-compete agreement between two biopharmaceutical research companies in Thermo Fisher Scientific PSG Corporation v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:22 pm
Episode 11 of the Class Re-Action Podcast just went live. [read post]
