Search for: "J. A. Nicklin" Results 241 - 260 of 321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of WFZ v BBC [2024] EWHC 343 (KB). [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
IPSO  13241-21 Wood v Helensburgh Advertiser, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 01139-22 Mehson v Mail Online, 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02465-22 Gleeson v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), No breach – after investigation 02466-22 Gleeson v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021),… [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2021 there was a pre-trial review in the case of Banks v Cadwalladr before Nicklin J. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Belatedly, we report on a recent seminar held at the insurer Hiscox, on the future of press regulation with 5RB’s Matthew Nicklin and Wiggin’s Caroline Kean. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
While there has not been a great deal of case-law on the application of section 9 to date, the early signs are that courts will apply it strictly: see Ahuja and the very recent (brief and obiter) analysis of section 9 by Nicklin J in Huda v Wells and ors [2017] EWHC 2553 (QB) at [84]-[85]. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 6:47 am by INFORRM
Mr Justice Nicklin had previously found that the words complained of in the Article bore the defamatory meaning that: the Claimant has engaged upon, supported and encouraged a campaign of online abuse and harassment of a 16 year old girl, conduct which has also incited her followers to make death threats towards her (a statement of fact). [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
On 16 February 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 16 January 2023, there was a trial of preliminary issue in the case of Shah v Saddique & other (QB-2021-001140) before Steyn J. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Dixon v North Bristol NHS Trust [2022] EWHC 3127 (KB) by Nicklin J. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Jay J heard the trial in the case of Triaster Ltd v Dun & Bradstreet Ltd. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was handed down in Sayed Zulfikar Abbas Bukhari v Syed Tauqeer Bukhari [2022] EWHC 173 (QB) on the 1 February 2022 by Murray J. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Lloyd v Google LLC, heard 21 to 23 May 2018 (Warby J) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
On 14, 15 and 16 November 2018 Mann J heard a CMC in the third wave of phone hacking cases against the News of the World and the Sun, Various v News Group Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Humphreys J stated that there had been “no debate around the issue of the public interest, relevant to the anonymity of suspects, nor any consideration of the need for a fair balance of rights. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am by INFORRM
On 7 June 2024, Steyn J handed down judgment in Harrison v Cameron and ACL [2024] EWHC 1377 (KB). [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 17 February 2021 Saini J heard an application in the case of Weaver v British Airways. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:45 am by INFORRM
In Hewson v Times Newspapers Ltd [2019] EWHC 650 (QB), Nicklin J ruled that meaning could be determined on the basis of the parties’ written submissions. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Recent Judgments On 10 February 2022 Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Harcombe v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2022] EWHC 543 (QB)  dealing with the question as to whether there should be preliminary issues in what the judge described as “the most significant piece of defamation litigation that I have seen in a very long time” [9]. [read post]