Search for: "Market Merchandisers, Inc."
Results 241 - 260
of 544
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2017, 11:26 am
(later joined by SolarWorld Americas, Inc.) pursuant to Sections 201-202 of the Trade Act of 1974. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 8:27 am
But its website markets ads, merchandise, and ad-free experiences to all comers The majority says this case is easily resolved by its 2002 Revell precedent (a progeny of the legendary, and legendarily bad, 1997 Zippo precedent): Our decision in Revell requires dismissal. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:02 am
Haydel Enterprises Inc., No. 12–2515, 2013 WL 4591195 (E.D. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 3:09 am
Sandal Factory, Inc., Opposition No. 91212582 (March 8, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:29 am
"That both parties market and sell their products through the Internet is unpersuasive. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:22 pm
The plaintiff first argued that the merchandise should be classified as a brassier or similar article. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 2:21 pm
Already, the CPSC and the Baby Bather manufacturer – Summer Infant, Inc., of Woonsocket, R.I. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
This doctrine is explained in Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:22 am
A spokesman for Christmas, Inc., declined to say whether a takeover of Kwanzaa might not be in the works as well. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 9:34 am
Marketing Group, Inc., 337 B.R. 230, at a time when the U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 9:34 am
Marketing Group, Inc., 337 B.R. 230, at a time when the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:08 pm
Auto Part Network, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 11:42 am
This issue has been addressed most recently in a lawsuit against Ohio State University, which named Honda and IMG Worldwide, Inc. as co-defendants. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:59 pm
A.V.E.L.A., Inc., et al. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:10 pm
(‘Buddy Boo’), a company which, inter alia, develops and markets Boo merchandise. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:27 am
Sam’s East, Inc., 2020 WL 2561255, No. 18-11561-FDS (D. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 10:29 am
Case citation: Amazon.com, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 3:14 am
It had to be decided how the marks would be perceived by the average consumer, in the relevant market, who is reasonably well-informed and observant, taking account of the type of goods and how they are marketed. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:19 pm
For purposes of Sigvaris, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:34 am
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. [read post]
