Search for: "Mattel Inc" Results 241 - 260 of 503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2009, 12:41 pm
Mattel, Inc., 128 S.Ct. 1396 (2008) repeatedly stated that the statutory grounds are exclusive. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 6:08 am
Metro Area Personal Injury Law Blog, we have posted articles related to: A recent Fisher-Price / Mattel, Inc. recall of toys made in China due to lead levels An expanded Mattel, Inc. recall including more lead paint and dangerous magnets A recent recall of Thomas & Friends wooden train sets due to lead paintFor information about your legal rights, please click here or call the law firm of Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
The Lanham Act has never been extended to ” ‘quash an unauthorized use of the mark by another who is communicating ideas or expressing points of view.’ ” Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 6:23 am
Minor point: Patry finds it significant that, in Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
Mattel, Inc., 518 F.3d) to show dilution ("the whittling away of the value of a trademark when it’s used to identify different products", Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 3:00 am
Mattel Inc., en el que la semana pasada se realizaron los alegatos orales.Hechos del Caso El caso se refiere a una demanda por responsabilidad ambiental. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm
 An article by Douglas Wickham of Littler details a recent decision by the Central District of California in Aqua Connect, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:38 pm
(WSJ) Fisher-Price Fined Over Toy Lead: The Consumer Product Safety Commission said toy-maker Mattel Inc. and its Fisher-Price unit will pay a $2.3 million civil penalty to settle allegations that they knowingly imported and sold up to two million toys that violated a federal lead paint ban. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:16 pm
Mattel, Inc., No. 06-989, 552 U.S. ___, 2008 WL 762537 (March 25, 2008).Because the particular arbitration at issue was part of a U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:39 pm by Conor McEvily
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008); and if such review is available, should a reviewing court determine "irrationality" under the totality of the circumstances, or are awards impregnable unless it is "clear from the record that the arbitrators recognized the applicable law and ignored it"; (2) whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) requires vacatur of an arbitral award issued by arbitrators who failed to disclose material facts bearing on their integrity and… [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 8:50 am
Mattel, Inc., ___ U.S. ___ (2008) (Cause No. 06-989) Technorati Tags: arbitration, ADR, law, Supreme Court addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.karlbayer.com%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D132'; addthis_title = 'No+Longer+can+you+Craft+Your+Own+Arbitral+Standard+of+Review'; addthis_pub = ''; [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:49 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Other notable companies receiving low political transparency scores include toymaker Mattel Inc., discount stores Dollar General Corp. and Dollar Tree Inc., Michael Kors Holdings Ltd., Tyson Foods Inc. [read post]