Search for: "Mike Rounds" Results 241 - 260 of 1,416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2023, 6:12 am by Jack Bogdanski
I see that Portland's terrible district attorney, Mike Schmidt, made the rounds on a couple of TV public affairs shows over the weekend. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 6:37 am by lgraham@bc-cm.com
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt sent a letter to Senators Joni Ernst (R-IA), Charles Grassley (R-IA), Pat Roberts (R-KS), John Thune (R-SD), Mike Rounds (R-SD), Deb Fischer (R-NE), and Ben Sasse (R-NE) to confirm his commitment to support the spirit and the letter of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:00 pm by Juvan Bonni
Recent Headlines in the IP World: Paddy Baker: Ripple Wins US Patent for New Oracle-Based Smart Contract Design (Source: Yahoo Finance) Valerie Bauman: Third Circuit Limits FTC Ability to Recoup Profits From AbbVie (1) (Source: Bloomberg Law) Jon Cohen: The Latest Round in the CRISPR Patent Battle has an Apparent Victor, But the Fight Continues (Source: Scientific American) Mike Peterson: Future HomeKit System Could Track Users Through Rooms, Authenticate Via Biometrics… [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 9:17 am by Hilary Hurd
Mike Gallagher (R-Wisc.) has plans to develop a supporting bill in the House. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:35 am by Mike McBride
Related posts:Exterro Covers LegalTech LegalTech Blog Round-up Day 1 LegalTech RSS Feed [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 3:38 pm
Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong, the prosecutor in the Duke lacrosse case, has been disbarred by the North Carolina State Bar. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 11:53 am by Carter Wood
Senator Mike DeWine defeated the incumbent appointee, Richard Cordray. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:04 am by Michael McCann
Interesting note from ESPN.com's Mike Andrews, the President and Executive Editor of SoxProspects:. . . the deadline for major league teams to lock up their remaining unsigned picks from the 2010 draft is tonight at 11:59 pm ET. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 8:33 am by David Post
West stages one of its sad little round robins this week to see who gets to go 8–8 and lose, 31–7, to the Saints or Eagles in the playoffs. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:52 am by Kiran Bhat
Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post also has coverage of the Montana court’s decision, as do Kim Murphy of the Los Angeles Times and Charles S. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 6:27 am by Nabiha Syed
” Finally, Mike Tolson of the Houston Chronicle sat down with former Justice Stevens to chat about diversity on the Court, judicial activism, and whether the Constitution is a living document. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:43 am by Marissa Miller
The Huffington Post’s Mike Sacks has brief previews of both M.B.Z. and Jones. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
Adam Liptak of the New York Times has coverage of the opinion, as do Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Peter Urban of Arkansas News, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, and Reuters. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:13 am by Conor McEvily
”  Coverage of the poll comes from Greg Stohr at Bloomberg Businessweek, Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, M.J. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:12 am by Anna Christensen
”  At First One @ One First, Mike Sacks also covers the Judge Walker’s reliance on Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:50 am by Nabiha Syed
And writing at his Dorf on Law blog, Mike Dorf focuses on Justice Kagan’s dissent in the case, as does Frank Astin at the New Jersey Star-Ledger. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 7:10 am by Kali Borkoski
”  At the Huffington Post, Mike Sacks  reports on some of the reactions to the report from both ends of the ideological spectrum and concludes that the responses “show[] that the chief failed to stop the criticisms of 2011 from carrying forward into the inevitable outcries the Court will face as it tackles the politically charged cases dominating its 2012 docket. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:52 am by James Bickford
  At Dorf on Law, Mike Dorf argues that the status of disparate impact claims under Title VII is “an ambiguity in anti-discrimination law” at the heart of the case. [read post]