Search for: "NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC."
Results 241 - 260
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm
National Football League, 560 U.S. 183, 192-196 (2010). [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
At the time, the Company was the official pizza sponsor of the National Football League.[9] On the Earnings Call, Schnatter made the following comments:Now to the NFL. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:22 pm
As another example, the National Football League has maintained a blackout policy that states that a home game cannot be televised locally if it is not sold out 72 hours prior to its start time. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm
National Australia Bank to determine whether or not Congress intended RICO to apply extraterritorially. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
National Football League (1709 Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Omega SA - American lawyers love expensive watches, ABA amicus brief confirms: Costco Wholesale Corp v Omega SA (IPKat) US Trade Marks – Decisions 9th Circuit modifies tests for laches and acquiescence: Seller Agency Council, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 3:06 pm
Couric asked Ginsburg about football players who were taking a knee during the national anthem. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:45 pm
Safeway, Inc., No. 08-55671. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:50 pm
[3] R v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia and Adamson; Ex parte Western Australian National Football League (Inc) (1979) 143 CLR 190. [4] See Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) guide on “Whistleblower protections for not-for-profit organisations” (ASIC Guide) here [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
They say the league failed to educate football players about the risks of head injuries. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:18 am
In any event, noted the Panel in National Football League v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm
NFL – holding that the National Football League is not a single entity exempt from antitrust laws – drew most of the attention. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
In addition, the Court sought the Solicitor General’s views on the potential liability of the National Football League and its member teams for alleged antitrust violations in the marketing of clothing and headwear decorated with team logos and trademarks (American Needle Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In American Needle, the Court stripped the National Football League of Section 1 immunity by holding that the NFL is not entitled to the single entity defense under Copperweld and instead, its conduct must be analyzed under the “flexible” rule of reason.[25] And last year, in NCAA v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:13 pm
National Football League, 560 U.S. 183 (2010), where the Supreme Court held that NFL and NFL Properties, the league’s intellectual property licensing arm, were capable of engaging in a conspiracy within the meaning of Section 1 is potentially distinguishable. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
2014. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
However, when this duty is neglected, various defendants arise, including school districts, sports leagues, coaches, and even teammates. [41] In Benejam v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:33 am
Singtel Optus v National Rugby League and the Australian Football League NSD1430/2011. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
NFL for NPR, Nina Totenberg described the case as “a Hail Mary pass by the NFL . . . with other sports leagues cheering on the football league. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:19 pm
He was hired in 2001 as the vice president of legal affairs for the XFL, a short-lived off-season football league owned by the WWE. [read post]
