Search for: "Prime Designs Inc "
Results 241 - 260
of 481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Sapient Canada Inc. 2014 ONSC 2314 (paras. 145-157); and, R. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Sapient Canada Inc. 2014 ONSC 2314 (paras. 145-157); and, R. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 1:42 pm
For a similar (though not identical) case, see the Where the Wild Libel Lawsuits Are case from the Texas Supreme Court (New Times, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:53 am
“Investigators of Anthem Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 12:46 pm
According to the press release, in 2008, the government began investigating various prime contractors that claimed to have conducted business with the Native American-owned firm, American Indian Builders & Suppliers, Inc. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine It is well understood by now that cyber security is a concern for every organization and that it is an issue on which every company’s board should be focused. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:56 am
See generally Tesla Elec., Armature & Mach., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
, a director of Swing N Scaff Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
, a director of Swing N Scaff Inc. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:00 am
Therefore: (1) the “prime directive” of the national standards states: “an organization shall always be prepared to produce its records as evidence”; and, (2) the proof of “records system integrity” required by the electronic records provisions is very necessary. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:28 pm
” Seems like a First Amendment violation to me, but the Second circuit just upheld this today, Children First Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 9:11 am
CMS Contract Management Services, Inc. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:06 pm
Camp Noble Inc., d/b/a 3-D Marketing submitted a quotation. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
`The prime concern’ in deciding Rule 45(f) transfer motions `should be avoiding burdens on local nonparties subject to subpoenas, and it should not be assumed that the issuing court is in a superior position to resolve subpoena-related motions. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
`The prime concern’ in deciding Rule 45(f) transfer motions `should be avoiding burdens on local nonparties subject to subpoenas, and it should not be assumed that the issuing court is in a superior position to resolve subpoena-related motions. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:23 pm
Motorola, Inc., No. 08 C 3301, 2009 WL 464338 (N.D. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:08 pm
For a similar (though not identical) case, see the Where the Wild Libel Lawsuits Are case from the Texas Supreme Court (New Times, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
My overall assessment is that this proposal isn’t ready for prime time. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
It may not: Oracle won an important victory against Google when an U.S. appeals court decided Oracle could copyright parts of the Java programming language, which Google used to design its Android smartphone operating system - although use could still fall u [read post]
