Search for: "Tom Goldstein" Results 241 - 260 of 1,133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 6:08 am by David Oscar Markus
That's how Tom Goldstein describes today on the live blog over at SCOTUSBlog, which is worth headed to right now. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:21 pm by Buce
In the Wall Street Journal, Tom Goldstein explains the White House strategy as it pushes its Supreme Court shortlist:"The process itself is a signal about the things that they value," he said. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:52 am by Andrew Hamm
Speakers will include this blog’s Tom Goldstein, Adam Liptak, and David Savage. [read post]
18 May 2012, 5:57 am by Walter Olson
Ed Whelan charges the New Yorker’s Jeffrey Toobin with spinning the history of the First Amendment campaign regulation case [first, second, followup] Tom Goldstein at SCOTUSBlog, while sympathetic to Toobin’s overall project, also takes issue with him at numerous points. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:23 am
Supreme Court, and author Tom Goldstein has now been joined by 10 other reporters. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 4:30 pm
The panel of folks includes Tom Goldstein, Wendy Long, Mike Seidman, Scott Moss, Ed Whelan, and me. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:03 pm
In the this post and its comments, Tom Goldstein speculates that Justice Stevens is writing the opinion for the Court in Claiborne and Rita. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:27 am by Howard Wasserman
Witnesses include former Senator Arlen Specter, Tom Goldstein (of SCOTUSBlog and a little bit of Supreme Court litigating), Chief Judge Anthony Sirica of the Third Circuit, Chief Justice Mark Cady of the Iowa Supreme Court, and Maureen Mahoney of Latham & Watkins. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:20 am
Supreme Court cases, they'd be seen as experts and gain new clients for their firm, Tom Goldstein and wife Amy Howe thought when starting SCOTUSblog in 2002, at the onset of blogging. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 6:48 pm by Howard Bashman
Law bloggers Tom Goldstein and Eugene Volokh will join journalist/commentator Linda Greenhouse on a program titled “Media and Judicial Independence” taking place on Friday, May 15, 2020. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 2:10 pm
" Yesterday's Court filing shows that the District of Columbia has secured the assistance of both Walter Dellinger and Tom Goldstein to argue against the "individual rights" view of the Second Amendment. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:37 am by Amy Howe
  The cast for the preview will include Charles Cooper as Chief Justice White, Ronald Flagg as Justice Harlan, and SCOTUSblog’s Tom Goldstein as Justice Brandeis. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:00 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Appearing on the list means that the petition raises an issue that Tom Goldstein “has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:31 am
The title of this post is a quote from Tom Goldstein's live-blogging at SCOTUSblog in reaction to the handing down of the final opinions of the 2009 Supreme Court Term. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 2:06 am
That's the question raised by Jay Weaver in today's Herald.Less than 1% of cert petitions get granted, but Tom Goldstein signed on to this one and there are very interesting legal issues getting lots of pub. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:55 am by Dennis Crouch
Supreme Court specialist Tom Goldstein writes hopefully: “The longest-outstanding case is Bilski, the business methods patent case. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:20 am by Kali Borkoski
The briefing includes appearances by the blog’s own Tom Goldstein and Lyle Denniston, as well as the panel discussion with Akhil Amar, Michael Carvin, Paul Clement, and Neal Katyal. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 10:43 am by Andrew Hamm
., the Theater of Public Policy will host Dahlia Lithwick of Slate Magazine and this blog’s Tom Goldstein for an interview on the upcoming Term. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 10:02 am by Howard Bashman
“New term, new look”: Tom Goldstein has this post at “SCOTUSblog” explaining that, “with a smaller team running the blog’s day-to-day operations, we will no longer have full coverage of every merits case. [read post]