Search for: "v. Currie"
Results 241 - 260
of 633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2022, 7:19 am
Currie v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 5:56 am
Following the approach suggested in Lowery, the defendants in Curry v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
The recent order in Eggerling v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:51 pm
Lay/lie – My wonderful colleagues Anne Enquist and Laurel Currie Oates from Seattle University have best explained the distinction between these two words in their book Just Writing: Grammar, Punctuation, and Style for the Legal Writer (4th ed. 2013). [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:16 am
In People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:15 pm
As we have documented elsewhere, since the Supreme Court’s early 2018 decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 10:06 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:30 pm
In re-reading the DC Circuit's famous recent Second Amendment decision in Parker v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am
Curry, 294 S.W.3d 851, 856 (Tex. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am
Curry, 294 S.W.3d 851, 856 (Tex. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
“Curry favour with Donald Trump'” by granting trade mark rights… seriously? [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 10:48 am
In Williams v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:22 am
Currie, 2008 BCSC 1751. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:31 am
Liberty Credit Services v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
The facts of Curry. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 3:28 am
Unearned fees may be recovered in a malpractice action, and "plaintiff's damages may include 'litigation expenses incurred in an attempt to avoid, minimize, or reduce the damage caused by the attorney's wrongful conduct'" (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 443, quoting DePinto v Rosenthal & Curry, 237 AD2d 482, 482 [1997]; see 3 Mallen and Smith, Legal Malpractice § 21:6 [2008]). [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 3:04 am
Under Judiciary Law § 487 (1), an attorney who “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party” is liable to the injured party for treble damages (see Shaffer v Gilberg, 125 AD3d 632, 636 [2015]; Curry v Dollard, 52 AD3d 642, 644 [2008]). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:01 am
It touches on a subject that I covered in some prior posts arising from the case of Curry v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 9:27 am
Supreme Court 2007 consideration of Panetti v. [read post]
