Search for: "Hands On Originals, Inc." Results 2841 - 2860 of 3,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2010, 1:28 pm by Don Cruse
Meanwhile, the Texas Supreme Court was considering a similar question in Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 4:11 pm
 Section 230 was enacted as a direct result of the ruling issued by the New York State Supreme Court in Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:18 am by Scott A. McKeown
See, e.g., Hester Indust, Inc. v.Stein, Inc., 142 F.3d 1472, 1480 (Fed. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:41 pm by Dennis Crouch
Today the company sells a software only system called Kurzweil 3000 and continues to have the protection of the patent system thru his original 2000 patent and with additional patents e.g., Reducing processing latency in optical character recognition for portable reading machine (which is a software-only patent). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:22 am by Richard Montes
Probst - whether the original publisher of a libelous letter could be responsible for its subsequent publication in Newsday Flemming v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
This ensures that you have the original, un-tampered files. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:46 pm
Cool claimed the short-handed staff at Eureka Healthcare and Rehabilitation, a facility owned and operated by Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., routinely neglected her Alzheimer-suffering father. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 9:51 am by Darrin Mish
Under the original deal which was announced on September 25, 2008, the FDIC would have backstopped the sale of Wachovia to Citigroup Inc. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
The doctrine of patent misuse has its origins in a series of Supreme Court cases, beginning with the 1917 decision in Motion Picture Patents Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
The Tropicana Las Vegas was originally operated by a company named Hotel Conquistador, Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Stefanie Levine
 One of the more well known uses of a patent reexamination filed after a district court judgment was illustrated in In re Translogic Tech., Inc., 504 F.3d 1249, 1257 (Fed. [read post]