Search for: "DOES 1-19"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 19,424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2009, 5:26 pm
The summons to OPs under R 71(1) was issued in the name of the three examiners, completed by the name of a legally qualified member. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:59 am
The EEOC notes that requesting confirmation of vaccination is not a disability-related inquiry and does not disclose genetic information. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 12:39 pm
If the plaintiff does not meet these two preliminary requirements, the court is required to dismiss the action without prejudice, meaning the plaintiff will be prohibited from refiling its COVID-19-related claim. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am
In exchange, Solvay paid $12 million to Paddock, $60 million to Par and $19-$30 million annually for nine years to Actavis. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 1:57 am
Secondly, a look into national law does not produce any generally recognised principles. [read post]
25 May 2018, 1:24 pm
Since it has been determined that the boy and his father are able to amend their lawsuit, they have until June 1 to make changes. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 8:19 am
"(2) Art II., Sec. 1 Cl. 8 provides that "[b]efore he enter on the Execution of his Office, [The President] shall take the following oath. . . [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:00 am
The plaintiff filed this suit, on February 19, 2009, under Section 502(a)(1)(B) of ERISA (generally, permitting a participant to bring a suit for benefits). [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 4:36 am
Chang.[1] Howard Mintz, Trial Begins in '01 Bombing, San Jose Mercury News, Jan. 29, 2007.[2] Id.[3] Id.[4] Id.[5] Id.[6] Extradition Treaty, Jan. 19-22, 1922, U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:28 am
Removes a provision requiring a parent or guardian of a minor child who wishes to change the name of the minor child to publish the first notice of the petition for the name change not more than seven days after the date the petition is filed.Adoption mattersS.E.A. 140, P.L. 21-2010Effective March 12, 2010 (§ 1-9); July 1, 2010 (§ 10-11)Enacts IC 31-14-5-9 to provide that a man who is barred from establishing paternity under IC 31-19 (adoption), is prohibited… [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:45 am
How Does Your Country Compare on Corporate Taxes? [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 2:41 pm
Though G.S. 20-19 does not define a criminal charge resulting from its violation, violating such a restriction runs afoul of G.S. 20-7(e). [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
Moreover, the patent proprietor has consistently requested accelerated proceedings.On the other hand, the fact that the OD has not allowed the request of opponent 1 for a stay of the proceedings and has not cancelled the OPs foreseen on April 18, 2012, after opponent 1 had filed the statement of grounds in appeal case T 112/12 does not justify the suspicion of partiality on behalf of the OD. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 12:15 am
Code § 2106(1). [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 10:18 am
*Of note, the CMS rule does not similarly allow for a testing option. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:18 pm
And it does not address other potential impacts of the numerous other local, state and federal orders that have been issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
22 May 2020, 2:31 pm
§ 13-21-111.5(4).[21] [1] James W. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
The Supreme Court held that it does. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
With a communication of 19 April 2016 sent to the applicant on Form 3019 the registrar of the board noted a loss of rights pursuant to Rule 112(1) EPC. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
With a communication of 19 April 2016 sent to the applicant on Form 3019 the registrar of the board noted a loss of rights pursuant to Rule 112(1) EPC. [read post]
