Search for: "Donald Barrett"
Results 281 - 300
of 512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Quoted in House Sends article of Impeachment of Donald Trump to Senate, (Jan. 25, 2021). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
A group of Colorado voters contends that Section 3 of theFourteenth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits for-mer President Donald J. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Natasha Brunstein & Donald L. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 10:24 am
There can be little doubt that Donald John Trump has always been a con-con. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 10:24 am
There can be little doubt that Donald John Trump has always been a con-con. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 1:27 pm
This article is the first entry in a symposium previewing California v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
Quoted in The Best Defense of Donald Trump, The New Republic (Jan. 24, 2020). [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Gore--but Roberts hardly gets a free pass there, given that he, along with Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, was part of the Bush legal team in the case. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
Though it is less well known, and before it became politically necessary for now-jurists John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to dutifully carry out their part of the 2000 Republican strategy that resulted the 5-4 Bush v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:04 am
” In a series of coordinated lawsuits brought under the Foreign Emoluments Clause, plaintiffs contend that because “Defendant Donald J. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:03 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett echoed this point. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 3:06 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett dissented only on a procedural issue, and in fact agreed with the majority on the merits. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Seth Barrett Tillman, National University of Ireland, Maynooth Faculty of Law, and Josh Blackman, South Texas College of Law Houston, have posted Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen:Does the full “sweep and force” of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualify Donald Trump from the presidency? [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:50 pm
Justice Barrett is new, but Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh have been serving on the SCOTUS for some time already and they're going to look at the issue, not the party. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
Instead of reckless disregard for the truth, a writer would have to have reckless disregard for her own financial future when writing in negative terms about, say, Donald J. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 9:08 am
Ty Cobb, President Donald Trump’s lawyer for matters related to the Russia investigation, said he was not concerned that Manafort would offer damaging information about the president. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 8:19 am
Supreme Court (even before Coney Barrett replaced Ginsburg) said that Donald Trump's stated reasons for his "Muslim ban" did not matter. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:30 pm
Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas have been joined by Donald Trump's pro-life appointments Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh, in what appears to be a majority aching for the opportunity to reverse Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 3:28 am
But in 2020 McConnell hurried through President Donald Trump’s nomination of Amy Coney Barrett, with the final confirmation vote coming just a week before that year’s election. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 4:57 pm
., the Biden White House, eschewing the drama and game-show flair President Donald Trump employed with his high court nominees, removed any doubt by releasing a statement announcing Jackson as the pick. [read post]
