Search for: "Mattel Inc"
Results 281 - 300
of 503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2008, 8:26 pm
Mattel, Inc. [read post]
13 Dec 2012, 12:27 pm
Dec. 8, 2009) with Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 2:31 pm
Mattel Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:06 am
Mattel Inc. that manifest disregard is not among the grounds for vacature and thus cannot be used to vacate an award of an arbitrator - even if the parties agree to allow this ground for vacature by a court in their private arbitration agreement. [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:14 pm
” Mattel Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:09 am
Mattel, Inc., 94 USPQ2d 1315 (Fed. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
Co., Ltd., 668 F.3d 677, 681, 687 (9th Cir. 2012). [6] See, e.g., Mattel Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
Co., Ltd., 668 F.3d 677, 681, 687 (9th Cir. 2012). [6] See, e.g., Mattel Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:43 pm
The Ninth Circuit continued by recognizing that it had adopted the Rogers approach in the case, Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:40 am
Mattel, Inc. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:14 pm
Bratz Mattel, MGA Fight Final Brawl Over Bratz Rights How the Bratz Verdict May Impact You Bryant/MGA v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 12:59 am
But their use can raise red flags in a legal dispute.When British software developers came up with a program that could wipe files from computer hard drives, they gave it a hard-core name: Evidence Eliminator.It gets the point across, but can sure sound bad if a user gets hauled into court and is accused of illegally destroying documents.That's what happened in the high-stakes trial, now in federal court in Riverside, over who owns the rights to the hugely successful Bratz line of dolls.Toy… [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 pm
(1982), 69 C.P.R. (2d) 260 (F.C.T.D.), quoted with approval in Mattel, Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:31 am
But their use can raise red flags in a legal dispute.When British software developers came up with a program that could wipe files from computer hard drives, they gave it a hard-core name: Evidence Eliminator.It gets the point across, but can sure sound bad if a user gets hauled into court and is accused of illegally destroying documents.That's what happened in the high-stakes trial, now in federal court in Riverside, over who owns the rights to the hugely successful Bratz line of dolls.Toy… [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm
” Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 8:47 pm
On the negative side, 2009 saw a massive recall of Mattel Inc. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 12:28 pm
Dundas, Partial Enforcement of Arbitral AwardsSteven Caplow, Quick is Better than Right: Hall Street Associates LLC v Mattel Inc [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 9:28 pm
MGA Entertainment has brought suit against its liability insurers in the federal district court in Riverside, California seeking a declaration that it is entitled to CGL coverage for trade disparagement dispute with Mattel involving its popular line of Bratz™ dolls. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 11:06 pm
Previously on the DC Metro Area Medical Malpractice Law Blog, we have posted articles related to: A study showing that 9% of U.S. kids suffer from ADHD A new publication that presents ADHD treatment options without drug company bias A recent Mattel, Inc. recall over lead paint concerns For information about your legal rights, please click here or call the law firm of Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:55 pm
In one recent set of Replies I received the following cases were referred to: Bailey v IBC Vehicles Ltd, Cole v News Group Newspapers, Carpenter v Mid-Kent Healthcare Trust, William Patterson v Cape Darlington & Ors, Mattel Inc & Ors v RSW Group plc, Ghannouchi v Houni, Francis v Francis and Dickerson, Smith Graham v The Lord Chancellor’s Department and Crane v Canons Leisure Centre. [read post]
