Search for: "DOES 1-19" Results 2981 - 3000 of 19,424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2020, 1:40 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Rust-Oleum Corporation, --- F.3d ----, No. 19-20210, 2020 WL 1808871 (5th Cir. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:23 pm
The will, dated August 1, 1960, was admitted to probate on January 24, 1961. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 3:10 am
P. 6(b)[(1)(B)], or (2) move to withdraw and amend its admissions pursuant to Fed. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:46 am
Article 14 of the Directive reads as follows:Until such time as amendments to this Directive are adopted on a proposal from the Commission in accordance with the provisions of Article 18, Member States shall maintain in force their existing legal provisions relating to the use of the design of a component part used for the purpose of the repair of a complex product so as to restore its original appearance and shall introduce changes to those provisions only if the purpose is to liberalise the market… [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:57 am by vera
Indeed, it does not appear that CTP has brought suit against the 200 parties it threatened to sue. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:43 am
If the answer to question 1 is yes, under which conditions and how does this effect the exclusive right? [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
Ultimately, "the court must consider whether both the alleged facts and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from those facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the People, would, if true, establish every element of the crime charged" (People v Barona, 19 Misc 3d 1122[A], 1, 2008 NY Slip Op 50814[U] [Crim Ct, NY County 2008]). [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:04 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
”  FMRA § 213(c)(1), although what precisely constitutes an “extraordinary circumstance” is not explained in the proposed rule. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 2:45 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The patent claims, descriptions and drawings are only one set of the objective circumstances to be taken into account, inasmuch a patent application does not focus on a product’s visual appearance. [read post]
27 May 2013, 1:42 pm by Anubha Sinha
& Anr, and reiterated the four pronged test for disparagement laid down in them:(i) An advertisement is commercial speech and is protected by Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution(ii) An advertisement must not be false, misleading, unfair or deceptive. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 7:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted summary judgment that: (1) OWW was collaterally estopped from challenging the invalidity of claims 1, 2, 4, 15, 16, and 20 of the ’237 patent; (2) claims 18, 19, 21, 22, and 23 of the ’237 patent were invalid for obviousness; and (3) Alps failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact with respect to inequitable conduct. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:17 am
Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), which administers the VICP, does not provide an explanation for this drop in filings, it appears likely that it is a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]