Search for: "DOES 1-19" Results 3021 - 3040 of 19,424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2016, 12:07 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Thus, we conclude thatthe district court did not err in granting summary judgmentthat Compaq’s F10 BIOS does not meet the “commands”limitation in claims 1, 3, and 5. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:41 pm
 One man in his sixties, however, who died from cancer in Texas, had a Salmonella infection linked to the outbreak, which may have contributed to his death.The following states have been affected:Arkansas (10 persons), Arizona (39), California (10), Colorado (8), Connecticut (4), Florida (1), Georgia (18), Idaho (3), Illinois (78), Indiana (11), Kansas (14), Kentucky (1), Maine (1), Maryland (25), Massachusetts (18), Michigan (4), Minnesota (2), Missouri (12), New… [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 11:15 am by Elyssa Sternberg
  This post does not address the potential impacts of the numerous other local, state and federal orders that have been issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Abarca (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 475, 481–482, review granted October 19, 2016, S237106 [same]; People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:03 pm by News Desk
COVID-19 impact and staff shortagesOnly 24 and 23 percent of all 79 Victorian councils reported they had assessed all registered class 1 and 2 premises in 2020 and 2021 respectively. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:30 pm by FM Librarian
," Cogent Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1 (2018)"Why Here? [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 3:45 am by David A. Wolf
Pursuant to Section 6-19 of the County Ordinances for Putnam County, Florida, a dangerous dog is defined as any dog, according to the records of the department of animal control, that has: (1) aggressively bitten, attacked, endangered or has inflicted severe personal injury on a human being on either public of private property; (2) more than once severely injured or killed another domestic animal while off its owner's property; (3) been used primarily or in part for the… [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 11:43 am by David Chidlaw and Robert Foster
  This article does not address the potential impacts of the numerous other local, state and federal orders that have been issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including, without limitation, potential liability should an employee become ill, requirements regarding family leave, sick pay and other issues. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:36 am
However, she claims that she still could not have been convicted of `intentionally viewing’ child pornography because `due process does not permit [her to be] convicted of an uncharged classification’ of 18 Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes § 6312(d)(1). [read post]