Search for: "FILTER TECHNOLOGY INC" Results 301 - 320 of 530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2009, 6:38 am
– Google’s cloud computing plans and computer lawyers’ expanding field of legal knowledge (Singularity Law) New advocacy group pushes OSS for the USA (Ars Technica)   US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Motion re infringement contentions granted in part: Linex Technologies, Inc v Belkin Intern, Inc (EDTexweblog.com)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Digital Technology… [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
See Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 4:30 pm
"This technology is already out there, it's just not filtering out to the light-truck and passenger tire side of the business," says Sean Kane, a researcher at Safety Research & Strategies Inc., a Rehoboth, Mass., firm that often works with plaintiff's attorneys. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
Gift Center 2006 LTD., Ezer Deker, Ami decorative Products LTD. and Shlomi Nahisi (IP Factor) FILTRON trademark for filters rejected as confusing to public based on earlier FILTRAN marks also for filters (IP Factor)   Netherlands District Court The Hague finds Abbot’s stents do not infringe Medinol’s patent (EPLAW)   Spain Court donates 200 fakes to an NGO (Class 46)   Switzerland Federal Administrative Court: SNOWSPORT cannot be registered for tyres… [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:58 pm by Dean Gonsowski
Make sure to review independent research from analysts such as Gartner, Inc., as part of the vetting process instead of starting from scratch. 6. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:58 pm by Dean Gonsowski
Make sure to review independent research from analysts such as Gartner, Inc., as part of the vetting process instead of starting from scratch. 6. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 8:23 am by Eric Goldman
The court’s overview lays out the obvious conflict with Supreme Court precedent: Indiana’s age verification requirements are likely unconstitutional…In the case most like the one here, the Supreme Court affirmed the preliminary enjoinment of the Child Online Protection Act…because the regulations were not particularly effective as it was easy for minors to get around the requirements and failed to consider less restrictive alternatives that would have been equally effective… [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]GlobalEvents in Bali heap further pressure on all IP owners: (IAM),Velcro defies generic claim in domain name battle: (OUT-LAW),ICANN forms group to hasten non-English domain names: (IP Justice)WTO members continue debate on geographical indications register: (Intellectual Property Watch),Creative Commons launches CCo and CC programs: (World IP Day),Green IP Strategy - risks… [read post]