Search for: "Individual Does 1-10"
Results 301 - 320
of 14,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2017, 5:56 am
” While what constitutes a valid marriage is usually left up to the individual 50 states, the VA does have its own interpretations and can add or subtract requirements in certain circumstances. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 6:40 pm
On Thursday, September 27 (at 10:00 AM Pacific; 12:00 PM Central; 1:00 PM Eastern), I’ll be speaking on “Facebook for Lawyers” for an hour as part of Avvo’s Free Legal Marketing Seminars series. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 6:40 pm
On Thursday, September 27 (at 10:00 AM Pacific; 12:00 PM Central; 1:00 PM Eastern), I’ll be speaking on “Facebook for Lawyers” for an hour as part of Avvo’s Free Legal Marketing Seminars series. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 10:40 am
Here are some items to consider: 1. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:33 pm
In upholding the individual mandate as constitutional, the Court addressed two issues: (1) whether Congress has the power to enact the individual mandate pursuant to the Commerce Clause, and (2) whether the individual mandate constitutes a valid exercise of Congress’ power to tax. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:55 pm
Should the Mayor not sign the Bill within thirty days of the Council’s approval (i.e., by December 10), absent veto, it will become law. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 4:15 am
In a 6-1 Chamber Judgment in Taganrog LRO and Others v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 6:56 am
For example, an individual with a net worth of at least $1 million, less the value of his or her primary residence, is an accredited investor. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 8:32 am
The plaintiffs served process on BLP on August 1, 2013. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 5:34 pm
§ 736.0802(10)). [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am
With communication of 11 December 2008 the Receiving Section issued a noting of loss of rights pursuant to Rule 112(1) EPC in respect of European application No. 05 858 797.3, informing the original applicant that the application was deemed to be withdrawn (Rule 160(1) EPC) for non-performance of the acts required by Rule 159(1) EPC for entry into the European phase.VI. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:22 am
On July 10, 1962, NASA launched Telstar 1, the first active communications satellite linking Europe and the United States through live television transmission. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
To obtain the visa, individuals must invest $1,000,000 (or at least $500,000 in a "Targeted Employment Area" - high unemployment or rural area), creating or preserving at least ten (10) jobs for U.S. workers excluding the investor and their immediate family. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Borak,[1] however, the Supreme Court implied a private right of action from the statute. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
§ 31(a)(1)-(4); see also Tr. 26:9–10 (“As long as you write the plan, there is no way to be in violation. [read post]
27 May 2022, 10:00 am
Stay tuned for Part 2 of Welcome to the Internet: Bad Faith Domain Name Registration and Cybersquatting. [1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/ [2] Notably, there is a process of “lifetime leases” where your registrar reserves the name for 10 years but then automatically renews the domain for another 10 years without the need to go through the renewal process. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:49 am
Among other things, the regulation does the following: – It creates a 60-day grace period for E-1, E-2, E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, O-1 or TN workers whose employment has terminated (so long as their authorized validity period has not ended). [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 10:22 am
If the search reveals that an existing employee or contractor has been excluded from the Medicare and/or Louisiana Medicaid Programs, the provider must notify the DHH within ten (10) working days of discovering the exclusion and provide the following information: 1) the name of the excluded individual or entity; 2) the status of the individual or entity, whether an employee or contractor; 3) the beginning and ending dates of employment or contract; 4)… [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:20 pm
An extraordinary number of individual US Senators have written to the SEC, some during the June 10-Aug. 1 extended comment period, out of a concern that the proposed risk retention regulations are too stringent and do not conform to the legislative intent of Section 941 of the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:20 pm
An extraordinary number of individual US Senators have written to the SEC, some during the June 10-Aug. 1 extended comment period, out of a concern that the proposed risk retention regulations are too stringent and do not conform to the legislative intent of Section 941 of the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
