Search for: "Michael V. Fair" Results 301 - 320 of 3,062
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 9:11 am by Walter Olson
Dukes symposium at Point of Law (1) Law, fairness, and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:53 am
The same could have been said of recent decisions at first instance on the corporate veil (particularly Ben Hashem v Shayif), until two magisterial judgments of the Court of Appeal this year: VTB Capital v Nutritek and, last week, Petrodel v Michael Prest. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:06 am by Michael Geist
The series on misleading on fair dealing continues with an examination of freely available materials, including four sources: public domain works, open educational resources, open access publishing, and hyperlinking to third party content (prior posts in the series include the legal effect of the 2012 reforms, the wildly exaggerated suggestion of 600 million uncompensated copies each year, the decline of books in coursepacks, the gradual abandonment of print coursepacks, the huge growth of… [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:56 am by Eric Goldman
Hawks Dismissed * Michael Savage Takedown Letter Might Violate 512(f)–Brave New Media v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 10:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" But the Fair Punishment story does not, and referenced a couple of Texas cases from before the passage of the Michael Morton Act. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Failure to include transcript of the disciplinary hearing bars any "meaningful appellate review"Matter of Michael Saunders v Rockland Bd. of Coop. [read post]
21 May 2015, 11:11 am by NCC Staff
Or is it fair to say that the Court creates laws in its rulings? [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 7:37 am
We at Michaels & Smolak make it a practice to request only a fee that we believe the judge will deem fair for the infant. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:16 am by Lawrence Solum
Michael Kent Curtis (Wake Forest University - School of Law) has posted Citizens United and Davis V. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:25 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Ashby v. [read post]